This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.
A divided federal appeals court previously held that the rule was lawful.
A federal appeals court previously ruled recovery efforts could proceed even in the absence of proof that investors lost money.
An appeals court stopped an order that would have required Rodney Scott to testify in the case about tariff refunds.
Two telecom companies argued that the FCC’s internal adjudication system violates their constitutional rights.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the failure of trading partners to address the importation of goods made with forced labor “is unacceptable.”
The Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision stayed a lower court ruling that had blocked Alabama from using the map.
Florida argued that California created an unconstitutional scheme that penalizes companies that move out of the Golden State.
The justices upheld a federal appeals court ruling exempting drivers from a federal arbitration law.
The high court ruled the trial judge misapplied a legal precedent dealing with selecting jurors.
The DOJ is supporting the RNC’s appeal of a Ninth Circuit ruling that blocks Arizona’s requirement that voters prove they’re citizens when registering to vote.
Lower court judges had ruled that the map, which redraws a majority-black district, was racially discriminatory.
A federal appeals court previously injected issues into the case that were not argued in court, the justices said.
Brian Flores, a Miami Dolphins head coach and current Minnesota Vikings defensive coordinator, alleges he faced discrimination from the league.
Florida filed the lawsuit after an illegal immigrant truck driver allegedly caused a crash in Florida that killed three people.
The new ruling clarifies the rules for companies withdrawing from underfunded union pension plans.
A federal judge previously found the company flouted her injunction against anticompetitive business practices.
The case focused on a convicted murderer’s attempt to argue his intellectual functioning was too low for him to receive the death penalty.
The justices considered the scope of the 1996 Helms-Burton Act, which allows U.S. companies to sue over property confiscated by Cuba.
The high court said vote-dilution claims against Mississippi and North Dakota need to be reexamined after its recent landmark redistricting ruling.
The federal government argued a federal appeals court correctly dismissed the case but said the Supreme Court should accept it because appeals courts disagree.
