US Supreme Court

In his annual report, Roberts stressed the importance of an independent judiciary.

Trump’s second term has brought a wave of litigation that tested the limits of judicial and executive authority.

Three conservative justices dissented.

A federal appeals court previously found the newspaper bargained in bad faith with its union, ordering it to restore prior health benefits.

A lower court had dismissed the case, finding there is no fundamental right to grow and sell marijuana.

The Fourth Circuit had overturned a lower court ruling dismissing the lawsuit.

The state said tests showed Frank Athen Walls was of normal intelligence.

A lower court found Terry Pitchford waived his right to claim discrimination.

The Sixth Circuit had held that Robert Holman, who won a block against the program, was not entitled to attorney’s fees.

The Tennessee Supreme Court previously held that license plates constitute government speech, not private expression.

California courts previously held that Catharine Miller violated a state civil rights law by declining to sell a same-sex couple a wedding cake.

Masahide Kanayama, a Christian missionary, allegedly put vegetable oil on two sacred buildings in Japan.

Louisiana courts previously held that the man’s federal claims could not be pursued.

‘Boulder’s lawsuit seeks to rewrite national energy policy by way of its state courts,’ University of California law professor John Yoo said.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer discussed tariffs during an event hosted by the Atlantic Council on Dec. 10.

The justices reviewed whether an appeals court had erred in the way it analyzed potential intellectual disability by a convicted murderer.

The president said there are longstanding misconceptions around how the Constitution’s 14th Amendment is interpreted.

The Trump administration sided with Alabama and said courts should evaluate IQ scores collectively.

A federal appeals court previously ruled against a Republican committee, saying high court precedent requires coordination restrictions.

The Trump administration’s tariff policies are before the Supreme Court.

In his annual report, Roberts stressed the importance of an independent judiciary.

Trump’s second term has brought a wave of litigation that tested the limits of judicial and executive authority.

Three conservative justices dissented.

A federal appeals court previously found the newspaper bargained in bad faith with its union, ordering it to restore prior health benefits.

A lower court had dismissed the case, finding there is no fundamental right to grow and sell marijuana.

The Fourth Circuit had overturned a lower court ruling dismissing the lawsuit.

The state said tests showed Frank Athen Walls was of normal intelligence.

A lower court found Terry Pitchford waived his right to claim discrimination.

The Sixth Circuit had held that Robert Holman, who won a block against the program, was not entitled to attorney’s fees.

The Tennessee Supreme Court previously held that license plates constitute government speech, not private expression.

California courts previously held that Catharine Miller violated a state civil rights law by declining to sell a same-sex couple a wedding cake.

Masahide Kanayama, a Christian missionary, allegedly put vegetable oil on two sacred buildings in Japan.

Louisiana courts previously held that the man’s federal claims could not be pursued.

‘Boulder’s lawsuit seeks to rewrite national energy policy by way of its state courts,’ University of California law professor John Yoo said.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer discussed tariffs during an event hosted by the Atlantic Council on Dec. 10.

The justices reviewed whether an appeals court had erred in the way it analyzed potential intellectual disability by a convicted murderer.

The president said there are longstanding misconceptions around how the Constitution’s 14th Amendment is interpreted.

The Trump administration sided with Alabama and said courts should evaluate IQ scores collectively.

A federal appeals court previously ruled against a Republican committee, saying high court precedent requires coordination restrictions.

The Trump administration’s tariff policies are before the Supreme Court.