Why ADHD Drugs Work for Some Kids–and Fail for Others

Experts weigh in on when ADHD medication is the right call–and when it is not. 
Why ADHD Drugs Work for Some Kids–and Fail for Others
Illustration by The Epoch Times, Shutterstock
|Updated:
0:00

Kendra Watts was stunned when her son came home from school yelling and crying to the point of his veins popping out of his neck. Just months before, it was out of character for the 9-year-old with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to ever raise his voice.

It dawned on her that the drug that was supposed to help him was altering his personality one frustrating fit at a time.

Her son took stimulant medication with minimal issues for years, until he had to switch to a new medication under the family’s insurance plan. Watts quickly discovered what many ADHD parents have learned: Medication can be a minefield.

ADHD medication typically works well for what it’s designed for—improve attention and motivation while reducing impulsivity and hyperactivity. The problem is, medication does not work well for everyone. Effectiveness depends on the child, the drug, and the diagnosis—factors that can spin a web of complexities for parents to untangle.

Medication Mismatch

There are two main types of medication—stimulants and nonstimulants—and about 30 stimulant formulations for doctors to choose from that have a variety of immediate-release and extended-release ratios.

Different kids respond to different release times. Watts’s son’s medication changed from Concerta—an extended-release medication—to Focalin XR—a half immediate-release drug, which gives a strong delivery in the morning and a delayed afternoon release. The surges jolted his system, giving him dramatic emotional and energetic peaks and valleys.

Nonstimulants work well for some children, but many require stimulants to see a meaningful effect.

Stimulants are the most commonly prescribed medication for ADHD, with a study published in The Lancet Psychiatry finding that—at least for short-term treatment—methylphenidate, medications such as Ritalin and Concerta, work best in children and adolescents, and amphetamine-based medications such as Adderall and Vyvanse, are more effective for adults.

“Some children do very well with stimulants,” Dr. Daniel G. Amen, a psychiatrist and founder of Amen Clinics, told The Epoch Times in an email.

Stimulant medication tends to be most beneficial in children with moderate to severe symptoms, demonstrated problems with behavior or school, a strong family history of ADHD, and patterns of low activity in the prefrontal cortex, which governs focus, Amen said.

However, stimulants come with more intense side effects such as decreased appetite, sleep problems, irritability, increased anxiety, dry mouth, headaches, and stomachaches. Therefore, some children have to deal with these downsides.

Watts’s two children responded well to Concerta, but experienced appetite suppression. They learned to eat lunch even if their brains were not relaying hunger signals.

Nonstimulant alternatives can be considered for children who have anxiety, do not tolerate stimulants, or have sleep or appetite problems, Amen said. Common nonstimulants include atomoxetine (Strattera) and guanfacine (Intuniv). They are not as potent and take longer to work—four to 12 weeks of continuous use before effects are seen.

When and how fast stimulants should be released remains a puzzle for many patients, leading to new drug formulations such as evening-dosed, delayed- and extended-release methylphenidate, which goes by the brand name Jornay PM. Often, the time-release schedule that works best will depend on when the child most needs symptom relief, because stimulants are not designed to work on 24-hour cycles; nonstimulant drugs, however, work around-the-clock.

“[Kids with ADHD] do not all respond the same to medication,” Amen said. “This is why a one-size-fits-all approach often fails. If symptoms worsen, don’t just adjust the dose.”

Side Effects That May Lead to Discontinuation

Side effects are a big reason for children discontinuing their medication.
An international study of 1.2 million children published in The Lancet Psychiatry found that 35 percent of children aged 4 to 11 and 53 percent of adolescents aged 12 to 17 quit ADHD medication within a year. Discontinuation was associated with side effects, as well as with poor response rates, and stigma—including teenagers believing that ADHD is a childhood disorder and feeling that they no longer need medication.
Adolescents in a qualitative study published in BMC Psychology noted that medication helped them to be more engaged in school and more social with friends. They described being less stressed, irritable, aggressive, and restless—changes that won favor from friends.

However, it also left them feeling “flat” or “numb” to the point that they stopped taking it.

“A few reported a sense of losing their personality, stating: ‘I am more myself without medication,’” the authors noted.

More severe potential side effects have also recently been reported. Research has linked amphetamine-based stimulants to an increased risk of psychosis and bipolar disorder. Ritalin has been associated with an increased risk of becoming overweight and having a shorter stature. While such events are rare, one concern is whether they are discussed when prescriptions are written.

Treating the Wrong Problem

Sometimes the medications do not work as expected because the child may not have ADHD in the first place. Just because children cannot sit still, be compliant, or finish schoolwork does not always mean that they require a diagnosis.

Clinical psychologist Gretchen LeFever Watson told The Epoch Times that in an effort to help children, a number of doctors and teachers are overstepping their roles in some cases to suggest medication for symptoms that may or may not be ADHD.

Dr. Allen J. Frances, a retired Duke University psychiatrist and ADHD expert, one of the most prominent critics of diagnostic overreach in American psychiatry, describes the rush to label behavior as ADHD as a societal indoctrination and insists that the true rate of ADHD is 2 percent to 3 percent. The current ADHD rate, he said, reflects systemic pressure rather than clinical reality.

“The U.S. rate of 11 percent is caused by pharma pill pushing, careless docs who spend just a few minutes with the kid, worried and perfectionistic parents, and harried teachers,” he told The Epoch Times in an email.

Frances noted abundant research showing that being the youngest in a class risks being diagnosed with and medicated for ADHD. A study of nearly 12,000 U.S. students published in the Journal of Health Economics found the youngest children in the fifth and eighth grades are nearly twice as likely as their older classmates to regularly use stimulants for ADHD.

“The only possible interpretations are [that] we have turned immaturity into mental illness and treat it with a pill, kids are taking pills they don’t need,” Frances said.

Medical issues such as head injuries, emotional trauma, and poor sleep can also mimic or exacerbate ADHD.

Doctors who are quick to prescribe might not be asking key questions, drilling down to other factors that could cause ADHD-like symptoms or impact how effective medication might be, Amen said.

Children who are eating junk food, spending excessive time online, staying up late, waking up early, and dealing with emotional stress are more prone to behavior issues. “These factors directly affect brain function—and how medication feels,” he said.

Short attention span, distractibility, impulsivity, disorganization, and having trouble completing tasks are signs of ADHD. It’s important to distinguish these from short-term behavioral issues, otherwise the medications may end up causing more problems than they solve.

Medication Remains a Key Strategy

However, if a child does have ADHD and his or her symptoms persist and are clearly interfering with many facets of life, medication is one treatment option to consider.
One meta-analysis found that both stimulants and nonstimulants are effective for managing symptoms and improving quality of life in children, including positive self-esteem, emotional well-being, and overall health. Another analysis reported that while children with ADHD are at higher risk of depression, the use of stimulant drugs lowers the risk.

Watts said medication was the right decision for her children, so she appealed the medication change to her insurance company and won. Both of her children, who are now adults, are successfully back on Concerta. Her daughter, now a teacher, vocalized as a young child the relief of being able to hold only one thought in her head, Watts said, and her son, who is currently in college, lost the faraway look in his eyes and became mentally engaged.

When Medication Is Not the Right Tool

Even if the right medication was used, it may not always be the best answer; some children need a different treatment approach altogether.

One example of a non-drug approach is training parents and teachers in behavior management strategies—a method that Watson applied in a Virginia program in the mid-1990s. The program emphasized positive reinforcement, less discipline, and appropriate use of time-outs. Over six years, it produced a 32 percent decrease in ADHD diagnoses in a region where 17 percent to 19 percent of children had been labeled with the condition—with 84 percent of those taking medication—figures that were unusually high.

Watson noted in a paper that she wrote detailing the experience that drugs deflate a child’s self-efficacy, undermining motivation to participate in cognitive behavioral therapy, which is an approach with strong supporting evidence behind it, particularly when combined with parent training.

The program was eventually shut down following an anonymous complaint alleging that Watson was fabricating high diagnosis rates as part of an anti-medication agenda. She was later fully exonerated, but the program was never restored.

Other evidence-based strategies include boosting protein intake and lowering sugar intake, prioritizing sleep, getting daily exercise, limiting screen use, and using targeted nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, magnesium, and zinc, Amen said.

“When you support the brain, symptoms often improve, and medication needs may decrease. Sometimes medication isn’t needed at all. Medication is only one tool,” he said.

Slowing Down

Like Watts, most parents gain medication feedback through trial and error. Although her children both feel like medication is the right treatment for them, some families struggle through many medications and may never find the right fit. In the absence of clear longitudinal evidence, decisions remain murky.

Universally relying on medication, although it gives short-term benefits, can have long-term adverse consequences, Watson said.

So far, most studies look at the effects of ADHD medication only for several weeks and sometimes only for seven days. The longest-running government-funded trial of ADHD treatment, conducted 17 years ago, concluded that medication benefits do not persist long-term.

Treatment decisions should steer clear of a universal quick fix, Watson said

“We’re trying so early on to get everybody on the same path,” she said. “We have to get people not to be so afraid and slow things down and to remember with the young years, it’s okay not to be top of the class.”

Amy Denney
Amy Denney
Author
Amy Denney is a health reporter for The Epoch Times. Amy has a master’s degree in public affairs reporting from the University of Illinois Springfield and has won several awards for investigative and health reporting. She covers the microbiome, new treatments, and integrative wellness.