For years, regulators focused on two “forever chemicals” above all others; however, a new study has found that their replacements may be just as concerning.
The research, published in Frontiers in Aging, suggests that specific environmental chemicals may influence how quickly the body ages at the molecular level—especially during midlife, a period that may represent a critical window of susceptibility.
What the Study Found
The study analyzed data from 326 U.S. adults using exposure data from 1999 to 2000.Researchers analyzed blood levels of multiple PFAS compounds in people aged 50 and older, estimating biological age using 12 DNA-based aging measures and accounting for age, sex, smoking history, and inflammation markers.
Two compounds showed significant associations with epigenetic aging. Perfluorononanoic acid was linked to several mortality-related aging clocks and measures reflecting a faster pace of aging. Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid was associated with one lifespan-predictive clock. Legacy PFAS compounds—including the more widely studied perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid—showed no significant associations.
Xiangwei Li, a professor of epidemiology at Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine and the study’s corresponding author, cautioned against reading that as good news for legacy compounds.
“I interpret this not as evidence that legacy PFAS are safe, but rather that regulatory and monitoring frameworks should look beyond only the most historically studied compounds,” he said.
Why Middle-Aged Men May Be Most Vulnerable
Before considering PFAS levels, the study found that biological aging markers already differed across age and sex groups.Men showed faster biological aging on several mortality- and pace-of-aging measures, and adults aged 50 to 64 showed greater acceleration than those 65 and older. When PFAS exposure was factored in, the strongest associations were again seen in men aged 50 to 64.
“Similar exposure levels do not necessarily mean similar biological responses,” Li told The Epoch Times.
He said that the PFAS may have different biological effects depending on factors such as age and sex.
“In men, age-related hormonal and body-composition changes may influence how toxicants are processed or how aging-related pathways respond to environmental stressors,” Li said.
The Broader Picture–PFAS and Health
PFAS are pervasive in the environment. They have been found in people and animals across the globe, and they have been detected in the blood of an estimated 97 percent of Americans.Because PFAS tend to affect the same biological systems—particularly the immune system and liver—combined exposures may compound harm.
Dr. Michael Fossel, author of “Reversal: Science, Medicine, and a Future Beyond Aging,” told The Epoch Times that environmental exposures can damage or kill cells, increasing cell division and telomere shortening—a process in which the protective caps at the ends of chromosomes become shorter each time a cell divides, widely considered a marker of cellular aging—both of which drive the epigenetic changes associated with aging.
What You Can Do
Although PFAS are widespread and persistent, reducing exposure where possible may still help. Exposure reduction is currently the most practical option available because no therapies have been proven to slow or reverse biological aging in humans.Other steps that may help reduce exposure include cooking at home with fresh, whole foods and limiting take-out and packaged foods, which often come in grease-resistant packaging. Avoiding products labeled “stain-resistant” or “wrinkle-resistant” and choosing textiles and home goods that do not contain PFAS can also help.
Some people face higher exposure risks.
“People with occupational exposures often have the highest levels of PFAS in their blood,“ Stoiber said. ”This includes those working in production facilities, related industries, or firefighters.”
Many exposures occur at systemic levels, through water infrastructure, environmental contamination, and industrial sources, Li said, and meaningful risk reduction goes beyond individual action and requires policy and regulatory oversight as well.







