We Still Don’t Know If Domestic Animals Can Spread Ebola

We Still Don’t Know If Domestic Animals Can Spread Ebola
This is an undated image released on Wednesday Oct. 8, 2014 by animal rights organisation PACMA of Javier Limon, husband of the nurse assistance who is infected with Ebola in Madrid, with his dog named Excalibur. At least one major study suggests that dogs can be infected with the deadly virus without having symptoms. But whether or how likely they are to spread it to people is less clear. AP Photo. PACMA
|Updated:

Spanish authorities have euthanised the dog of Madrid nurse Teresa Romero Ramos, who contracted Ebola. The 12-year-old dog, Excalibur, was not showing symptoms and was not tested for Ebola. But he lived with Romero Ramos when she became ill and was destroyed as a precaution, despite widespread protests.

This has raised questions about the role domestic animals might play in the spread of Ebola. But before we get to dogs and cats, we need to start with bats – the natural host of Ebola and a number of other viruses including Hendra virus, rabies, SARS (sudden acute respiratory syndrome) and MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrom).

African fruit bats were established as the host of Zaire Ebola virus after antibodies were detected in a number of species. Though interestingly, bats are not affected by the virus.

Intermediate Hosts in Viral Transmission

For many of the viruses carried by bats, there is no evidence of direct bat-to-human transmission. More often than not, an intermediate host – or spillover host – gets infected following contact with infected bat material.

Spillover hosts generally develop severe disease and are capable of shedding the virus in large quantities, which can pass to people who come in close contact with secretions from the infected animals.

Ebola originated in African fruit bats. (Livingstone's Fruit Bat CC BY 2.0)
Ebola originated in African fruit bats. Livingstone's Fruit Bat CC BY 2.0
Michelle Baker
Michelle Baker
Author
Related Topics