Information trapped inside noncompatible software and rapidly changing federal and state regulations has likely contributed to a consolidation of health care providers, which limits the number of physicians in private practices.
Overlapping and conflicting regulations between state and federal agencies have created most of the burden for physicians, said Matthew Katz, the executive vice president and CEO of the Connecticut State Medical Society and a board member of the Physicians Advocacy Institute (PAI).
“You never know if you code in one way, are you violating state law, are you violating federal ... and why does everyone want something in a different way?” he said. “It makes it very confusing for physicians and clinicians.”
HHS says it has heeded the industry’s calls and recognizes that its regulations are a big part of the problem.
“As health care providers across the health care continuum seek to improve the ways they deliver care by incorporating beneficial new information technologies, these sources of burden can impede further innovation, ultimately limiting potential gains in improved quality of care for patients and patient safety,” HHS Secretary Alex Azar said in a statement in the report. “We believe there are many steps HHS can take to reduce burden.”
HHS’s new strategy broadly has three goals: to reduce the effort and time required to record health information in EHRs, improve the intuitiveness of EHRs, and reduce the time it takes to meet regulatory reporting requirements.
Katz says the problem is not just about what clinicians have to record but how fast government regulations change.
“We are seeing such significant regulatory changes from year-to-year that you need consultants and you need volumes of books simply to keep up with those regulations,” said Katz. “And then once you’ve understood them, they change.”
Deregulation
HHS issued the strategy as a requirement of the 21st Century Cures Act, which requires that the agency ensure that electronic health information can be securely shared with other health information technology “without special effort on the part of the user.”But it’s also part of a larger deregulation push by President Donald Trump, who campaigned on deregulating the federal government. He has instructed all the federal agencies to cut regulations by 50 percent. For every new regulation imposed, two have to be cut.
The virtue of deregulation, according to proponents, is that it can reduce burdens on business and foster competition that will force prices down and choices up.
Some of what the Trump administration has done under the umbrella of “deregulation” is aimed at increasing competition, such as streamlining the drug approval process at the FDA to put more generics on the market.
Since then, short-term, limited duration health plans have been expanded from three months to three years; association health plans that allow small businesses and organizations to jointly provide coverage for employees have been established; as have health reimbursement accounts, to which employers make contributions to help employees pay for certain medical expenses not covered by their health plans.
“In the health care area, [the Trump administration has] publicly committed to an agenda of improving the system, increasing choice and competition, removing regulatory obstacles when they can,” said Ed Haislmaier, a senior fellow of health care policy at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. “They seem to be executing against that objective.”
He points out that the administration has been limited by what it can do without the help of Congress. Trump’s effort to repeal Obamacare, for example, died in the Senate last year when three Republicans voted against it.
At the request of Trump, CMS has instituted an initiative called Patients over Paperwork, which seeks to eliminate duplicate, outdated, or otherwise unnecessary regulations.
Between 2018 and 2021, CMS estimates the initiative will eliminate more than 53 million hours of paperwork burden for providers.





