Visions of Shakespeare’s Miranda

John William Waterhouse’s emotive canvases illustrate the feminine mystery of Shakespeare’s heroine in ‘The Tempest.’
Visions of Shakespeare’s Miranda
A detail of "Miranda," 1875, by John William Waterhouse. Shakespearean characters were a favorite subject of the Pre-Raphaelites. Private Collection. Public Domain
|Updated:
0:00

Women, water, and magic were common motifs throughout the oeuvre of British artist John William Waterhouse (1849–1917). Two canvases of the same subject, “Miranda” (1875) and “Miranda—The Tempest” (1916), exemplify these themes.

The first is an important early picture and the other is a major work among his final paintings. Although both show the character Miranda from William Shakespeare’s play “The Tempest” (circa 1611) on a beach, they have very different atmospheres, reflecting the times and specific interests of Waterhouse when he painted them.

A Sculpted Painter

John William Waterhouse in his studio, circa 1912, from volume 62 of "International Studio," 1917. Internet Archive. (Public Domain)
John William Waterhouse in his studio, circa 1912, from volume 62 of "International Studio," 1917. Internet Archive. Public Domain

Waterhouse was born in Rome to English parents who were painters. When he was a young child, the family returned to London, and his artistic talent was fostered through sketching in the city’s renowned museums. Waterhouse studied formally at the Royal Academy of Arts, pursuing sculpture before settling on painting. He exhibited nearly every year at the Royal Academy of Arts from 1874 to 1917. He was elected to the prestigious status of full Academician in 1895.

The mature work of Waterhouse continued the traditions of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. He embraced subjects that had interested the movement’s originators, including mythology, history, and contemporary literature. His canvases center often on a solitary beautiful woman. The 19th-century poem “The Lady of Shalott” by Alfred Tennyson inspired several famous Waterhouse canvases that date to different decades of his career, like his revisited Miranda.

“Lady of Shalott” 1888, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on Canvas; 60 1/5 inches by 78 7/10 inches. Tate Britain, London. (Public Domain)
“Lady of Shalott” 1888, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on Canvas; 60 1/5 inches by 78 7/10 inches. Tate Britain, London. Public Domain

A favorite subject of the Pre-Raphaelites was Shakespeare’s works. In addition to “The Tempest,” Waterhouse drew on other plays by the Bard for inspiration in works depicting Ophelia from “Hamlet,” of which he made multiple versions, and Cleopatra from “Antony and Cleopatra.”

However, early in his career, Waterhouse painted in the Academic style and was influenced by neoclassicism. His 1875 “Miranda” reflects these inspirations, although it was his first depiction of a Shakespearean heroine.

(Left) “Ophelia,” 1894, by John William Waterhouse. (Right) “Cleopatra,” circa 1887, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on canvas. Private collection. (Public Domain)
(Left) “Ophelia,” 1894, by John William Waterhouse. (Right) “Cleopatra,” circa 1887, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on canvas. Private collection. Public Domain
“The Tempest” was well-known to Victorians. Most viewers attending the 1875 Summer Exhibition at the Royal Academy of Arts, where this restrained painting was displayed, would have recognized the 15-year-old Miranda. Critics remarked on the display of Waterhouse’s skills in this work, with its powerful use of color and gradated luminosity.

Serene, Poetic Beauty

"Miranda," 1875, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on canvas; 30 inches by 40 inches. Private collection. (Public Domain)
"Miranda," 1875, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on canvas; 30 inches by 40 inches. Private collection. Public Domain

Waterhouse situates Miranda, wearing an ancient Greek chiton and bandeau, on a sandy beach with seashells and seaweed in soft evening light. His interest in classicism, prevalent in his 1870s works, accounts perhaps for his dressing Miranda in such garb instead of 17th-century dress.

Furthermore, Waterhouse may have been referencing the work of his contemporary Albert Moore (1841–1893), who specialized in depicting maidens in drapery in decorative paintings such as “Shells,” which was painted the year before Waterhouse’s “Miranda.” Additionally, Moore’s use of figures depicted with their backs to the viewer may account for Waterhouse’s composition in his own painting.

Interestingly, Waterhouse does not select a visually stirring scene to illustrate. Clouds are gathering, but the water is not particularly rough. Artists were often drawn to the dramatic parts of the play, showing the storm conjured by the magician Prospero (Miranda’s father) and a distressed Miranda witnessing the wreck of a ship that carries Ferdinand (her future husband).

Waterhouse pursued such a vignette in “Miranda—The Tempest,” but in this first picture, he invents his own composition that precedes the opening of the play. “Miranda” is thus a sensitive, personal interpretation of a subject, which is a characteristic of Waterhouse’s art.

This painting’s whereabouts went unknown for 131 years. Its 2004 rediscovery in a private collection in Scotland was heralded, with specialists marveling at its details and poetic beauty, and its reappearance has recalibrated scholarly assessment of Waterhouse’s career trajectory. It was sold at Bonhams in 2006 and then auctioned again at Sotheby’s in 2015.

Dramatic, Romantic Narrative

"Miranda—The Tempest," 1916, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on canvas; 39 1/2 inches by 54 1/2 inches. Private Collection. (Public Domain)
"Miranda—The Tempest," 1916, by John William Waterhouse. Oil on canvas; 39 1/2 inches by 54 1/2 inches. Private Collection. Public Domain

“Miranda—The Tempest” was painted in 1916. It is a more tempestuous treatment: Waterhouse shows a windblown Miranda in 17th-century dress with her left hand on her heart and right hand in her hair as she stands before a stormy shipwreck. The gesture likely refers to these lines spoken by Miranda: “Against my very heart! Poor souls, they perish‘d./ Had I been any god of power, I would/ Have sunk the sea within the earth or ere/ It should the good ship so have swallow’d” (Act 1: 11, 8, 12).

As with his first painting, Waterhouse hides Miranda’s expression from the viewer, presenting her in profile. It was auctioned at Sotheby’s in 2009.

The catalogue makes notes about Miranda: “[She] becomes a decorative object of dangerous beauty, her body surrounded by the violent bruised blue waves, the broken bits of Ferdinand’s ship’s mast suggesting the destructive, transformative power of love. In its imaginative interpretation of its literary source ... [and] complex layers of visual and allegorical meaning, [the painting demonstrates] ... a lifetime of artistic achievement.”

The scholarly theory is that this forceful composition, in such marked contrast to the 1875 painting, was a patriotic stance as a response to the horrors of World War I. During the war, many artists turned to historic British subjects such as Shakespeare’s plays. Miranda’s overflowing heart and feelings of helplessness would have resonated with women whose husbands, sons, and brothers were facing perils abroad. Waterhouse displays brilliantly not only advanced technicality, but also the power to evoke emotion in the viewer through nature, romantic narrative, and feminine mystery.

What arts and culture topics would you like us to cover? Please email ideas or feedback to [email protected].
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Michelle Plastrik
Michelle Plastrik
Author
Michelle Plastrik is an art adviser living in New York City. She writes on a range of topics, including art history, the art market, museums, art fairs, and special exhibitions.