“i would like to be one of your writers. how can i start?”
Many factors contribute to this decline in literacy—particularly digital communication technologies that encourage lazy, short-form messages lacking proper grammar, punctuation, syntax, and complexity of thought.
The good news here is that bad habits can be replaced with good ones. Orwell writes, “If one gets rid of these habits one can think more clearly, and to think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration.”
Focus on Clarity
We write in order to communicate something. Period. If a piece of writing cannot be readily understood, it’s failed its primary purpose. A piece of writing should serve the reader by making comprehension smooth and effortless. This requires looking at the subject from the reader’s perspective and remembering that the reader doesn’t have all the background information or connecting ideas that you possess in your own head. You have to make everything explicit on both the sentence level and the paragraph level.One caveat: Of course, “clarity” will mean different things in different contexts. If you’re writing a thesis on German postmodern philosophy, written for an audience of professors, then your writing will involve significant complexity of thought, terminology, and diction, yet it will be clear enough to that audience. But if you write your business emails like a German philosophy paper, you’re no longer communicating clearly to the intended audience in the intended mode.
Imagine getting a work email that begins: “Your earnings report recedes into an undifferentiated understanding. When something is understood but still veiled, it becomes unveiled by an act of appropriation and this is always done under the guidance of a perspective which ...”
Delete.

Use Strong Verbs
Strong, interesting verbs improve a piece of writing faster than just about anything else. Verbs carry the weight of the sentence, and a vivid verb generally creates a more vivid impression in the reader than an interesting adjective or adverb. In Gary Provost’s “100 Ways to Improve Your Writing,” he writes, “[Verbs] are the executives; they should be in charge.”He gives some practical tips: “Sharpen a verb’s meaning by being precise. Turn look into stare, gaze, peer, peek, or gawk. Turn throw into toss, flip, or hurl. Inspect adverbs carefully and always be suspicious. Are they trying to cover up for a lazy verb? Most adverbs ... should be shoveled into a truck and hauled off to the junkyard.”
Use Active Voice—Most of the Time
I took this rule from Provost’s “100 Ways to Improve Your Writing.” Here, he rephrases a traditional rule that it’s better to use active voice than passive voice. Active voice means the subject of the sentence performs the action of the sentence (“The boy threw the ball.”). Passive voice means the subject receives the action (“The ball was thrown.”). Active voice almost always leads to greater clarity, vividness, and power in your writing.However, I appreciate that Provost says “most of the time,” because occasions arise when the passive voice is more appropriate.
Follow the MEAL Structure
Like a well-built house, a proper paragraph needs a firm structure. One such structure is MEAL, which stands for main idea, evidence, analysis, and link to thesis. This structure works especially well for any kind of argumentative or academic writing, but it can be adapted to other forms as well.Stick to 1 Main Idea
Paragraphs are not random blobs of words arbitrarily divided up on a page. They are discrete units of meaning.A good writer will divide paragraphs strategically, along natural fault lines that already exist. Put simply, each paragraph should be about one, and only one, main idea.
Cut Words When You Can
I have adapted one of Orwell’s rules for good writing. In his original rule, he says to “always” cut out an unnecessary word. However, I think this limits stylistic freedom and poetic diction too much. Besides, how do you define an unnecessary word? Sometimes a word isn’t necessary for the meaning of the sentence but may be necessary for the rhythm, sound, or style of the sentence. Nevertheless, Orwell’s basic point stands: We often use eight words to say something we could say in four. This leads to convoluted and confusing sentences. Less is more.







