Opponents say it’s a regressive tax that doesn’t deliver anything, while proponents say it’s not a tax, but it puts a price on greenhouse gas emissions.
Two climate scientists say new EPA rules to cut CO2 emissions “will be disastrous for the country, for no scientifically justifiable reason.”
Listening to government officials speak about climate change, one could easily assume that their plans were based on settled science...
2015 was the year the United Nations and governments around the world abandoned rational thought about climate change.
Opponents say it’s a regressive tax that doesn’t deliver anything, while proponents say it’s not a tax, but it puts a price on greenhouse gas emissions.
Two climate scientists say new EPA rules to cut CO2 emissions “will be disastrous for the country, for no scientifically justifiable reason.”
Listening to government officials speak about climate change, one could easily assume that their plans were based on settled science...
2015 was the year the United Nations and governments around the world abandoned rational thought about climate change.