Small Is Beautiful: Miniature Paintings by Edward Greene Malbone

Small Is Beautiful: Miniature Paintings by Edward Greene Malbone
Eliza Izard (Mrs.Thomas Pinckney, Jr.), 1801, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on ivory; 2 7/8 x 2 3/8 inches. (Public Domain)
Yvonne Marcotte
10/30/2022
Updated:
11/1/2022
Parents often keep a photo of their children in a wallet or purse. Although worn and wrinkled, the photo keeps their children close to them as they go about their daily life. Families in the 18th and 19th centuries had the same wish, and so miniature paintings grew in popularity among prosperous early Americans. 

Usually no more than two inches, a miniature was made to be held in the hands of a single viewer to create a sense of intimacy with a loved one when physical proximity was not possible, either for engaged couples or loved ones separated by war. Placed into small frames, the miniatures could be pinned inside a jacket or placed in a pocket for easy access to look at throughout the day.

According to the website of the Weibold Studio, conservators of miniature portraits, the paintings were made to tighten emotional bonds with special people:

Portrait miniatures might have been exchanged by an engaged couple, or worn to remember someone who lived far away, or who had perhaps died. Some even contain a lock of the loved one’s hair—either underneath the portrait or displayed on the back intricately woven with seed pearls or golden threads.

Many of the finest American portraitists, such as Gilbert Stuart, popularized the art form by bringing European miniaturists to the United States to satisfy the prosperous citizens who wished to wear and display these intimate pieces.

Making It Small

Portrait miniatures developed in the 16th and 17th centuries. The most common technique used a watercolor-based paint on ivory, although some were painted on stretched vellum. Others were created with oils on copper.

At the height of the popularity the miniatures in the mid-1800s, miniaturists in the United States tried to replicate the look of an oil portrait. And, as these portraits’ popularity grew, miniaturists improved their skills, especially in stronger coloring, more detail, sharper focus, and a high finish.

On the right, a close-up of the face shows hatching to blend the rose-colored cheek with the rest of the face. Eliza Izard (Mrs. Thomas Pinckney Jr.), 1801, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on ivory; 2 7/8 inches by 2 3/8 inches. (Public Domain)
On the right, a close-up of the face shows hatching to blend the rose-colored cheek with the rest of the face. Eliza Izard (Mrs. Thomas Pinckney Jr.), 1801, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on ivory; 2 7/8 inches by 2 3/8 inches. (Public Domain)
For those wishing to take up the skill, manuals promoted learning to bring out the subject’s luminous flesh as the defining feature of the portrait; it was a painstaking process. “Artists used the most translucent shades of watercolor the painter could achieve, applied in sheer layers to allow the ivory to shine through,” according to the Morgan Library & Museum’s analysis of its collection.

“Highlights in the face were executed by either leaving the ivory bare, or delicately removing painted layers to expose the support. Thus, the pale complexion was rendered in ivory, itself a material of luxury that implied a conflation of precious material with desirable appearance.”

The most popular technique was painting with gouache (an opaque watercolor) on ivory, a challenging task that required meticulous preparation of the ivory and special painting techniques. If an artist were to simply paint directly onto the ivory, the colors would blend together and lose definition. Thinly sliced along the grain, the ivory was cleaned to remove all organic oils and sanded in preparation for miniature painting. Artists used painting techniques such as hatching (short lines overlapping to show gradations in color) and stippling (repeated dots of color) to avoid muddying colors.
Skilled craftsmanship was used on the casework, called a “portrait box,” to present the portrait at its best and complete the commission. “Thin sheets of ivory were attached to pieces of laid paper (finely textured paper) so the artists could manipulate the piece while painting,” according to The Gibbes Museum’s description of casework.

“Once finished, the paper was trimmed to fit a case and allow the ivory to fit snuggly against the glass, protecting it from dust and moisture. To keep the ivory from shifting, other pieces of paper, often playing cards or scraps, were layered beneath the painting.”

Colored glass was added to some miniature cases to elevate the richness of the object.
A self-portrait by miniature artist Edward Green Malbone, circa 1798. Corcoran Gallery of Art. (Public Domain)
A self-portrait by miniature artist Edward Green Malbone, circa 1798. Corcoran Gallery of Art. (Public Domain)

The Artist, Both Admired and Amenable

As the foremost American miniaturist, Edward Greene Malbone was widely admired by both American and British artists, and he made a name for himself as a master of the miniature portrait.

Self-taught, Malbone left his home in Rhode Island to work as a miniaturist alongside painter and friend Washington Allston (1779–1843) in Boston. Allston remarked on Malbone’s amenable disposition and his way of using his artistic skills to bring out the inner goodness in those who posed for him: He had “the happy talent … of elevating the character without impairing the likeness [of his sitters].”

As his skills grew, Malbone traveled up and down the East Coast gaining popularity. For a time, he honed his skills in England but returned to the United States to work in Charleston, South Carolina, in 1801. Now in great demand, Malbone began his most prolific period of work, completing three miniatures a week.

Malbone’s miniatures provide insight into the sitters’ character and spirit in a unique way. In his portrait of Eliza Izard, for example, he used a hatching technique, with small strokes and a mix of colors. Even though her skin looks smooth, closer study reveals small lines of color layered over one another to create a subtle blush in her cheek.

Several miniature portraits at the Smithsonian American Art Museum provide details about Malbone and his subjects. As word spread among families and friends, the artist’s commissions grew. Susannah Russell was a descendant of the Condé and Bourbon houses, and counted several French kings in her lineage, including Louis IV.

Miniature of Mrs. John Corlis (Susannah Condé Russell), 1795, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Miniature of Mrs. John Corlis (Susannah Condé Russell), 1795, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)

John Corlis, who had his miniature done in 1795, was a merchant-ship owner based in Providence, Rhode Island. From 1792 to 1810, the fleet traveled between the United States, the Caribbean islands, and Hamburg, Germany.

Miniature of John Corlis, 1795, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Miniature of John Corlis, 1795, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Joseph Manigault was a plantation owner and a member of the South Carolina legislature. The artist completed a miniature of his wife, Charlotte Drayton. 
Miniature of Mrs. Joseph Manigault (Charlotte Drayton), circa 1801, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Miniature of Mrs. Joseph Manigault (Charlotte Drayton), circa 1801, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)

Malbone painted miniatures of several members of the Poinsett family during his trip to Charleston between 1801 and 1802. He did a miniature of Dr. Elisha Poinsett, who was the father of Joel R. Poinsett, who was a member of the House of Representatives and secretary of war to President Martin Van Buren.

Miniature of Dr. Elisha Poinsett, circa 1801–1802, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Miniature of Dr. Elisha Poinsett, circa 1801–1802, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)

Susan Poinsett was recuperating from a lengthy illness at the time of her portrait, but her recovery was brief and she died two years later. The small portrait shows a wan young woman with sad eyes.

Miniature of Susan Poinsett, circa 1801–1802, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Miniature of Susan Poinsett, circa 1801–1802, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)

Henry Bounetheau, a leading miniaturist in Charleston, showed his great respect and admiration for Malbone by having him do the portraits of Bounetheau’s own family, including an aunt. It is not clear which of his aunts appears in this miniature.

Miniature of Henry B. Bounetheau’s aunt, circa 1804, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Miniature of Henry B. Bounetheau’s aunt, circa 1804, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)

By Today’s Standards

Although not as expensive as a full-length portrait, the price for such an emotional connection was not cheap, yet by the 1830s, newspapers carried ads for miniaturists. Often, a portrait painter offered a two-for-one to bring in clients to pose. As the full-size portrait was being done, the miniaturist who partnered with a portrait artist would complete a smaller likeness.

According to Malbone’s account book, he painted a Mr. Lawrence in December 1803 and was paid $70 for his efforts on Christmas Day. In today’s dollars, commissions for artists to complete an ivory miniature would range between $450 and $13,500 with an average of  $1,325. The cost would take in the reputation and skill of the artist, the materials used, and the quality of the casework. The price might go down if multiple family members had their miniatures made, and whether a full-scale portrait would also be ordered.

Miniature of Mr. Lawrence of Boston, 1803, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
Miniature of Mr. Lawrence of Boston, 1803, by Edward Greene Malbone. Watercolor on oval ivory; 2 3/4 inches by 2 1/4 inches. Smithsonian American Art Museum. (Public Domain)
historical marker in Savannah, Georgia, offers great praise of his skill: “Today Malbone is acknowledged to be the finest miniaturist his country has yet produced, and among the greatest of all time anywhere.”
Related Topics