Music Critics’ Impressions Aren’t Always Reliable

Time rather than critics determines whether music is worthy or not.
Music Critics’ Impressions Aren’t Always Reliable
Music criticism reached its peak in the 19th century but often missed the mark. Fine Art Photographic/Getty Images
|Updated:
0:00

Leonard Bernstein, the great American music man, once remarked “I’ve been all over the world and I’ve never seen a statue of a critic.” Of course, statues of critics exist, but only of those who critiqued music as a secondary calling. Robert Schumann, Hugo Wolf, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe and Thomas Mann are among the most notable, but were primarily creators. It is arguable that only those who have composed, written, or performed themselves are qualified, or entitled, to pass judgement on their fellows.

No monuments were raised to the wealthy intellectual Eduard Hanslick, who neither composed nor performed. However, he was one of the most powerful critics in 19th-century Vienna and said terrible things about Bruckner, Tchaikovsky, Liszt, and Wagner. No questions were asked about his license to assess or dismiss these geniuses.

Raymond Beegle
Raymond Beegle
Author
Raymond Beegle has performed as a collaborative pianist in the major concert halls of the United States, Europe, and South America; has written for The Opera Quarterly, Classical Voice, Fanfare Magazine, Classic Record Collector (UK), and The New York Observer. Beegle has served on the faculty of the State University of New York–Stony Brook, the Music Academy of the West, and the American Institute of Musical Studies in Graz, Austria. He taught in the chamber music division of the Manhattan School of Music for 31 years.