The eventual opinion could disrupt lower court proceedings and even result in another appeal that reaches the Supreme Court.

The case could affect Trump’s other trials and set a long-lasting precedent for future administrations.

Justices wrestled with how to define a president’s ‘official’ versus ‘private’ acts. A decision may delay President Trump’s trial, which would hand him a win.

Experts say the high court may remand the case back to the federal court for further proceedings, a move that would give Trump a strategic win.

Manhattan prosecutors contend that Trump engaged in a ‘criminal conspiracy’ to interfere with the 2016 election, but experts question the argument.

An agreement was reached between President Trump’s attorney and New York Attorney General Letitia James on the handling of the bond account.

President Trump’s jury selection has raised questions about the legal process and whether lawyers can serve as suitable jurors.

The case addresses a portion of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 pertaining to the obstruction of official proceedings.

Trump is headed to the first of his expected criminal trials on April 15. He’s facing felony counts related to his payments to Stephanie Clifford.