Twenty-eight years after the “shot heard round the world” at Lexington and Concord, President Thomas Jefferson in 1803 lit a powder keg of his own when first meeting Britain’s newly appointed minister to the United States, Anthony Merry.
Merry understood this to be a formal occasion and, accompanied by Secretary of State James Madison, he appeared at the President’s House in formal attire. He wore a blue dress coat with gold braid, white breeches, silk stockings, ornate buckled shoes, a plumed hat, and a gentlemen’s dress sword.
To Merry’s shock and disdain, Jefferson greeted him casually dressed in pantaloons, a simple coat, woolen stockings, and well-worn slippers.
Jefferson believed his actions to be a display of “republican simplicity” and American egalitarian principles. He believed that “republican simplicity” required America to break with European protocol, even if it offended foreign diplomats. Also, Jefferson had served as the country’s foreign secretary to France for four years and openly expressed anti-British sentiments.
Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?

Unlike his predecessors George Washington and John Adams, Jefferson disliked pomp and circumstance and European etiquette. Considering himself a man of the people, Jefferson preferred to imprint American government with protocols that he believed better reflected democratic-republicanism and egalitarian ideals.
Days after Merry’s initial meeting with Jefferson, he and his wife were invited to a small dinner party at the President’s House on Dec. 2. Merry assumed this private affair was in his honor, but, to his consternation, he saw that Louis Andre Pichon, the French chargé d’affaires, was also an invited guest. With Britain and France at war in 1803, Jefferson had invited diplomats from warring countries to the same social event.
Pêle-mêle
Jefferson debuted his new social policy of “pell-mell,” (from the French pêle-mêle) at the December
Instead, Jefferson escorted Dolley Madison and James Madison escorted Mrs. Merry. The guests continued to pair off until Anthony Merry had to enter the dining room by himself and take the last seat available. Afterwards, Merry complained to Madison that the dinner was a violation of standard diplomatic precedence but Jefferson’s defense was that the new custom was consistent with American egalitarianism.
Diplomatic Consequences
After that last insult and having received no instructions from England on how to respond, the Merrys boycotted all future social invitations and also convinced the Spanish minister, Marquis de Casa Yrujo, to join them in their boycott.
In that era, most business between nations was discussed at social events, and, when the British and Spanish ministers boycotted attending or hosting such functions involving American officials, it quickly hamstrung any trade deals between the United States and either of these two countries.
Domestically, Jefferson’s opponents from the Federalist party also weighed in on the breach of protocol, accusing the president and Democrat-Republicans of being anti-British and pushing informality to a fault.
Post-Controversy
The Merry Affair did not cause the War of 1812; it symbolized the breakdown of goodwill diplomacy and fed the bilateral irritation between the United States and England that crystalized in the War of 1812.Jefferson saw the affair as a statement asserting American independence and a reaffirmation rejecting monarchial protocols and promoting the new republic’s ideals.
Merry remained as Britain’s envoy until 1806, and while he and Elizabeth later hosted extravagant parties adhering strictly to British etiquette that were well attended, the Merrys never attended another White House event.







