Today, having a large family is a countercultural act. In the space of just a few generations, families abounding in children moved from being the norm to being the exception—an exception that will draw long looks from strangers at the grocery store. What was, not so long ago, an ordinary occurrence now marks out parents with more than two or three kids as cultural oddities.
In a somewhat puzzling trend, at the same time that affluence and standards of living have increased dramatically, people’s desire to reproduce seems to have decreased at just as rapid a pace. One might think that, as one of the richest societies in human history, the modern West would welcome lots of children with the confidence that there are plenty of resources to go around and with the desire to share our comfortable material existence with future generations. But that isn’t the course we’ve taken.
Douthat went on to sketch what he calls the “thinning of the family tree,” the way that once vast familial structures have rapidly dwindled as each generation has decided to have fewer children than the previous one.
“Everywhere across the developed world, the decline of birthrates means that families have grown more attenuated: fewer and later marriages, fewer brothers and sisters and cousins, more people living for longer and longer stretches on their own,” Douthat wrote.
He calls this phenomenon, which is virtually unheard of in human history, “postfamilialism.”
Abundance
Although I was born into a small family, I married into a large one (seven children). My wife’s house when she was growing up was full: full of toys and shoes and laughter and tears, full of shouting and chattering and bickering, full of boots and books and music and movies, full of, well, children, obviously—in a word, full of life.That house exuded a warmth and vitality I haven’t experienced anywhere else, not because everything ran perfectly smoothly—large families are always a little chaotic—but because the basic goodness of family life was multiplied and extrapolated. There were more people to love and there was more love to go around.

The first defense I’d offer, then, for large families has to do with this fullness, this plenitude. Of course, more children mean more work and more trials, but they also mean more fun and more joy, and it’s these latter realities that are so often overlooked in society’s perception of big families. Hardship and joy are part of the balance sheet of every life and every family, big or small.
The advantage of the big family, I have observed, is that it tends to mysteriously multiply the “joy” side and, over time, divide down the “hardship” side. While raising a lot of kids certainly entails sacrifices that can sometimes be quite painful, the purpose of those sacrifices is clear. Every new life provides the mother and father with new motivation and purpose, and the rewards are commensurate with the effort. The reward is a miracle: Another human person—with all the universe of experiences, emotions, and personality traits that make him uniquely himself—whom the parents can love and who can love the parents in turn.
Skill-Building and Other Benefits
From the perspective of the children, too, growing up in a large family brings a lot of blessings. We often hear that children from large families don’t do as well in school or receive fewer economic opportunities because there’s not always enough money to go around. But while that may be true in some cases, these drawbacks can be mitigated, and they have to be weighed against the many benefits of a big brood of siblings.Freedom to Choose
All of us want to live a full life. Conventionally, we are told that we can grasp this fullness by maintaining a large sphere of autonomy for ourselves: the freedom to pursue our personal goals and interests and to not be hemmed in by anything. For this reason, children, who necessarily take away from our autonomy, are often discouraged, viewed as obstacles rather than means to fulfillment.Yet the wisdom of the ages cautions us against equating “options” with “fulfillment.” We cannot keep endless options open forever. People must choose or life chooses for them. Having lots of kids is one generous path to choose (among others), a path that, while limiting freedom in one sense, opens it up in another as one’s interior freedom grows through sacrifice and love.

Life experience teaches us that, often, we only really discover ourselves through the act of giving ourselves to others—and one way to give oneself, of course, is to have children. A full household provides a better shot at a full life—in the deepest sense—than a full wallet. Relationships and responsibility bring more meaning than the pursuit of personal gratification, at least in the long run.
In “Man’s Search for Meaning,” psychologist Viktor Frankl wrote: “Ultimately, man should not ask what the meaning of his life is, but rather must recognize that it is he who is asked. In a word, each man is questioned by life; and he can only answer to life by answering for his own life; to life he can only respond by being responsible.”







