Is Your Portfolio Too Complicated? The Hidden Cost of Owning Too Many Funds

Simplicity wins: Three to 10 funds typically outperform bloated portfolios packed with overlap.
Is Your Portfolio Too Complicated? The Hidden Cost of Owning Too Many Funds
Olivier Le Moal/Shutterstock
|Updated:
0:00

How many funds is too many for diversification? Most investors get full protection with three to five well-chosen funds, while holding 15–20 or more funds usually signals over-diversification that hurts returns without lowering risk. Over-diversification, sometimes called “diworsification,” happens when investors own so many funds that the same stocks appear multiple times, fees stack up, and managing everything becomes too hard.

The best number of funds depends on your goals and account type, but keeping things simple often works better than making things complicated. A focused portfolio of five to 10 funds can beat a messy collection of 30–40 funds that basically own the same stocks over and over.

What Over-Diversification Really Means

Over-diversification happens when adding more funds hurts your portfolio instead of helping it. Most investors find the best number of funds will be between three and 10, depending on individual strategy and accounts. Beyond this range, investors often see their extra funds doing nothing helpful.
Adam H. Douglas
Adam H. Douglas
Author
Adam H. Douglas is a journalist and writer specializing in personal finance and literature. His recent work explores money management, book reviews, veterinary medicine, and long-term financial planning. He currently resides in Prince Edward Island, Canada, with his wife of 30 years and his dogs and kitties.