“Unlike my previous book, ‘Beyond Order’ explores as its overarching theme how the dangers of too much security and control might be profitably avoided,” he says.
While “12 Rules For Life” was put forward as “an antidote to chaos,” “Beyond Order” is designed to highlight the flipside of the archetypical landscape.
The Dangers of Excessive Order
As part of his announcement, Peterson also highlighted some intriguing cultural and political implications of his philosophy.“The order we strive to impose on the world can rigidify as a consequence of ill-advised attempts to eradicate from consideration all that is unknown,” Peterson writes. “When such attempts go too far, totalitarianism threatens, driven by the desire to exercise full control, where such control is not possible, even in principle.”
In archetypal terms, we cling to order and cleanliness because it keeps us safe from that which is strange and different.
But Peterson points out some even more striking implications of this idea. “Concerns about cleanliness and feelings of disgust have likewise been related to political attitudes ... regions with higher levels of disease prevalence tend to be associated with higher levels of social conformity and autocratic rule.”
Restoring Balance
While we don’t know yet if “Beyond Order” specifically addresses the lockdowns, the relevance is clear. Sadly, yet predictably, these excesses of order are exactly what we’ve seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. From business shutdowns to closed borders to gathering limits, people are more isolated than ever, and it’s all being done in the name of cleanliness.Unfortunately, the desire to control our neighbors and dictate their choices reflects a worldview in which the drawbacks of order are considered less consequential than the drawbacks of chaos. This paradigm may be alluring, especially in times of crisis, but for society to truly prosper, it needs to be called into question.
“It is customary nowadays to speak of ’social engineering.' Like planning, this term is a synonym for dictatorship and totalitarian tyranny. The idea is to treat human beings in the same way in which the engineer treats the stuff out of which he builds his bridges, roads, and machines. The social engineer’s will is to be substituted for the will of the various people he plans to use for the construction of his Utopia. Mankind is to be divided into two classes: the almighty dictator, on the one hand, and the underlings who are to be reduced to the status of mere pawns in his plans and cogs in his machinery, on the other. If this were feasible, then of course the social engineer would not have to bother about understanding other people’s actions. He would be free to deal with them as technology deals with lumber and iron.”
Mises’s point is that the economy shouldn’t be viewed as a machine that we can control and direct. It is much more akin to an ecosystem that flourishes best when left to its own devices.
So now, more than ever, as lockdowns and mandates overshadow nearly every aspect of our lives, we need to be wary of clinging to order, control, and security too tightly.
Hopefully, Peterson’s new book will bring that message to light.