US Bomber Showcases New Strategic Trick After Vanishing Act in Pacific

By Simon Veazey
Simon Veazey
Simon Veazey
Freelance Reporter
Simon Veazey is a UK-based journalist who has reported for The Epoch Times since 2006 on various beats, from in-depth coverage of British and European politics to web-based writing on breaking news.
April 27, 2020Updated: April 27, 2020

Last week, for the first time in 16 years, the U.S. Air Force left the key strategic Pacific island of Guam with no heavy bombers.

The vanishing act wasn’t a sign of weakness, but a new trick that the Pentagon is practicing to keep adversaries on their toes: dynamic force employment.

A few days later, a U.S. B-1 bomber was in the Pacific on a 30-hour round trip from North Dakota to Japan, precisely to showcase the new strategy at work.

“In demonstration of the U.S. Air Force’s dynamic force employment model, a U.S. Air Force B-1B Lancer bomber flew from the continental United States and integrated with the Koku Jieitai (Japan Air Self Defense Force or JASDF) to conduct bilateral and theater familiarization training near Japan April 22,” a statement by the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command reads.

“This operation showcases our unwavering commitment to the security and stability of the Indo-Pacific region through the employment of strategic forces from around the globe,” said Gen. C.Q. Brown Jr., Pacific Air Forces and INDOPACOM Air Component commander.

“From confronting invisible threats of a global pandemic to addressing military aggression and coercive activities, we remain a lethal, innovative, and interoperable force focused on a shared vision of upholding a free and open lndo-Pacific.”

Epoch Times Photo
A U.S. Navy MH-60S Knighthawk, U.S. Air Force RQ-4 Global Hawk, Navy MQ-4C Triton, Air Force B-52 Stratofortress’, and KC-135 Stratotankers stationed at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, perform an “Elephant Walk” April 13, 2020. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Michael S. Murphy)

The Navy and Army have also been experimenting with a similar strategic shift.

The aim is to avoid the predictability of fixed rotations or of permanent presence, stretching the same forces further, and keeping adversaries off balance. The strategy isn’t easy, however, as it requires higher levels of readiness overall, which brings a higher cost.

In 2018, for the first time in a decade, the Arabian Gulf was left without an aircraft carrier strike group, as the USS Harry Truman sailed to the Arctic Circle—the first carrier to patrol there since the Cold War.

Epoch Times Photo
The aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman transiting the Arabian Sea on March 18, 2020. (U.S. Navy photo by Aircrew Survival Equipmentman 1st Class Brandon C. Cole)

This was the Navy’s first taste of dynamic deployment.

The new strategy follows the demands of the 2018 National Defense Strategy for the military to be “strategically predictable, but operationally unpredictable,” Bryan Clark, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, previously told The Epoch Times.

“U.S. allies and adversaries know that U.S. forces will be deployed overseas and will respond quickly if there’s a crisis. But day-to-day, they won’t know whether U.S. force deployments are going to happen.”

The Army’s deployments to Europe and the Pacific Pathways are also linked to dynamic force concepts.

National Defense Strategy aims to pivot the military away from counterinsurgency to primarily focus on modernizing and adapting to pushing back on China’s newfound military muscle.

Chinese military spending has increased around tenfold over the past two decades, with the Communist Party building up the largest arsenal of long-range missiles in the world–precisely to hold U.S. aircraft at bay.

The intermediate-range D-26 missile—fielded while the United States was still bound by the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty—was even dubbed “the Guam killer” because of its potential to reach the U.S. island territory, a key strategic position in the western Pacific.

“The consistency and predictability of the [Guam] deployment raised serious operational vulnerabilities,” Timothy Heath, senior international defense researcher with the RAND Corp. think tank, told CNN. “A planner in China’s military could have easily plotted ways of destroying the bombers due to their well-known presence.”

Dynamic force deployment doesn’t mean that bombers won’t return to Guam, just that they will no longer be a permanent feature for China’s military strategists to rely on.