iPhone 6 Release Date, Features, Specs: iPad Mini, iPad 2, and New iPhone Will Have Touch ID
Apple’s Touch ID technology will be making its way into the iPhone 6 and iPad line.
According to cecb2b, Apple is working with the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) to install Touch ID sensors to the iPhone 6, the new iPad Air, and the third generation iPad mini in 2014.
Touch ID is what Apple dubs its fingerprint scanner technology, which it introduced via the iPhone 5S in September 2013. The iPhone 5S home button has Touch ID, and is currently the only Apple product with this tech.
iPhone 5S owners can use Touch ID to unlock their phones, as well as make purchases in iTunes and the Apple App Store.
While certainly a nifty feature to have, Touch ID was probably not introduced too quickly because it had teething problems. iPhone 5S users have found that the fingerprint scanner would not always recognize their fingerprint and unlock.
Apple has since released two patches with fixes for the Touch ID issue, namely, iOS 7.1 update in March, and iOS7.1.1 in April. While the patches have gone some way towards fixing the Touch ID degrading problem, they are not perfect fixes.
Still, Apple appears to be confident that it will get Touch ID right, as cecb2b also reports that Apple has already secured the first batch of Touch ID sensors for the upcoming Apple 2014 releases.
AP update: Apple awarded $119M, but who’s winning the fight?
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) — When a jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple $119 million for copying features of the iPhone, it was latest chapter in the worldwide legal fighting between the top two smartphone companies.
Friday’s damage award was far less than the $2.2 billion Apple demanded and the $930 million a previous jury ordered Samsung to pay after an earlier patent trial involving older-generation products. The jury also trimmed $158,000 from the latest award after finding Apple infringed one ofSamsung’s patents in making the iPhone line.
Both companies have filed lawsuits and other legal actions in Germany, England, France, South Korea, Japan, the Netherlands, Australia and elsewhere with mixed results.
Although U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose urged the companies to settle their differences, a settlement conference in February ended without an agreement and no end in litigation is in sight.
So, who’s winning?
It depends on the definition of victory. Samsung Electronics Co. has surpassed Apple Inc. as the top smartphone maker on the planet. Samsung has captured 31 percent of the $330 billion worldwide market compared with Apple’s 15.6 percent.
What about the two U.S. jury verdicts ordering Samsung to pay Apple a combined $1 billion for patent infringement?
Samsung, which has $41 billion in cash reserves, has yet to pay Apple a dime. The South Korean company is appealing the 2012 verdict ordering it to pay $930 million and it’s expected to appeal the $119 million verdict rendered Friday. More important, courts have refused to bar U.S. sales of any Samsung device found to have infringed Apple patents, so Samsung continues to sell the products at issue in the United States.
Why is Apple continuing its aggressive legal campaign?
“Apple simply cannot walk away from its inventions,” Apple lawyer Harold McElhinny told jurors during closing arguments last week.
Samsung lawyers argued during trial that Apple’s real target is Google Inc., the maker of the Android software that Samsung and other smartphone makers use in their devices. Though Google wasn’t party to the litigation in San Jose, the search giant played a prominent role in the trial.Samsung lawyers presented an email Apple co-founder Steve Jobs sent to top executives in 2010 ordering them to wage a “holy war” on Android in 2011. Jobs and top Apple executives view Google’s software as a direct rip-off of Apple’s operating system. Samsung’s lawyers argued that Apple targeted the South Korean company because Samsung is the top Android user.
What are the two companies fighting over?
The legal battle is rooted in Samsung’s launch of the Galaxy S in early 2010. Apple accusedSamsung of ripping off many features of the iPhone to create the Galaxy S. Apple filed the first of two lawsuits in the United States in 2011 covering the Galaxy S and other older generationSamsung devices. Apple filed a second lawsuit in 2012 alleging that many current Samsungproducts are violating Apple patents. The latest jury verdict found that Samsung violated two of Apple’s patents, including software that enables the “slide-to-unlock” function. Jurors found Apple violated a Samsung patent that helps smartphone users organize their photos and videos.
Each company will ask the judge in San Jose to ban sales of the devices found to infringe the other’s patents. Legal experts said those arguments are likely to fail because lawyers have to prove consumers, for instance, purchased iPhones solely because of the Samsung photo organizational patent. Apple lawyers will have to prove that consumers who purchased Samsungdevices did so because of the “slide-to-unlock” feature.