This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.
The lawsuit alleges that the new rule defies existing federal laws defining eligibility for public benefits.
Despite the Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), few Americans are paying attention to the bigger picture.
Last week, the House passed legislation to change the employer mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The goal was to reduce the number of small businesses that would be financially burdened by having to provide health insurance to workers.
President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul will cost less than it did before the Supreme Court ruling last month, but the decision runs the risk of leaving several million Americans uninsured.
On the third and final day of the Supreme Court’s hearing on the constitutionality of President Obama’s Affordable Care Act (ACA), the court’s Wednesday morning session focused on what should happen to the remainder of the law if in fact a ruling was made to strike down the contested individual mandate provision.
