Canada a Key Target for China, Says Former CSIS Senior Manager

As Trudeau goes on China trip, Michel Juneau-Katsuya says Canada is a ‘very important strategic ground to conquer’ for China

Michel Juneau-Katsuya, former Asia-Pacific bureau chief for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, in a file photo. (NTD Television)

Canada may not be in the same league as world powers like the United States or the United Kingdom. However, it is still a “very important strategic ground to conquer” for China, according to Michel Juneau-Katsuya, a former senior manager with the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS).

The reasons are threefold, he says.

First, Canada is a knowledge-based society, among the highest R&D spenders per capita in the world.

Second, Canada has a great reserve of natural resources that China needs.

Third, not only does Canada have valuable secrets of its own, whether they be technological, commercial, or defence-related, but Canada is also a strategic partner in all the major alliances and forums in the world, including the G7, G20, NORAD, NATO, and others.

“We’re the access door to Europe, or America, and this is well understood by the Chinese,” Juneau-Katsuya says.

“Canada will remain a very, very important strategic ground to conquer, and to be able to continue to influence [the Chinese] will do that, and they will never let go of Canada.”

That’s why Canada would be wise to tread carefully when dealing with Beijing, he says.

“I’m not saying that we must cut ties with China, I’m not saying that we shall not do business with China, but the Chinese will respect the people who are capable of showing a backbone. If you don’t show a backbone, they will never respect you.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is currently on a five-day trip to China, meeting with Chinese leadership to discuss bilateral and trade ties between the two countries.

Influence on Canadian Soil

While the two countries have not launched formal free trade negotiations so far, they have been holding exploratory talks since the Liberal government won the election in 2015.

Results of government consultations on a possible Canada-China free trade deal that heard from over 600 Canadian stakeholders including businesses, private citizens, civil society groups, and academia released in November showed that Canadians are concerned about the inconsistent rule of law in China, the adverse impact on Canadian jobs a free trade agreement with China would entail, and unfair competition from China’s state-owned enterprises. The stakeholders were skeptical that a free trade agreement would address these concerns.

Juneau-Katsuya says establishing a free trade deal with a country that doesn’t respect the rule of law wouldn’t be in Canada’s interest.

“It is not far-fetched to imagine the situation where some kind of commercial disagreement quickly turns into a political disagreement, and then somehow they will take either Canadians, or Canadian business, hostage, because we would be over there, and [the Chinese] would try to bargain by blackmailing us,” he says, citing as an example the recent case of Canadian winery owners who were detained in China over a customs dispute.

What could be even more concerning is that such a deal would give more access to agents-of-influence who work for China’s benefit, he said.

“When you start doing business with a partner who is not ready to play by the rules, who is not ready to be transparent and honest with you, you are a fool to believe that you can somehow change that person, because that’s part of who they are.”

Juneau-Katsuya said he could buy the logic that even if one party gains more out of a deal than the other, it is still ultimately beneficial to both parties, but the problem is, Canada would be getting more than it bargained for.

“We’re going to have more agents of influence, we’re going to have more people being capable of watching the Chinese community here, more people capable of spying on us and stealing our technology … and totally tip the balance in [China’s] favour,” he says.

Back in 2005, when Chinese diplomat Chen Yonglin defected to Australia, he revealed that China’s network of spies, informants, and front organizations that do the bidding of the communist regime are rampant on Canadian soil. Another defector, Hao Fengjun, a former police officer with the Chinese Public Security Bureau, said in 2005 that China has a network of 1,000 spies in Canada to watch adherents of Falun Gong, who are persecuted in China.

In 2010, then-head of CSIS Richard Fadden caused quite a stir when he said that a number of Canadian politicians are influenced by foreign governments, chief among them China. The Globe and Mail later reported that one of the politicians Fadden was referring to was Michael Chan, an Ontario cabinet minister.  Chan has said he is not a national risk to Canada because of his links to China and has launched a libel suit against the Globe.

“The problem that we have been experiencing for years and years and years now is that there has been efficient work performed by Chinese agents-of-influence, for generations, within the various governments,” Juneau-Katsuya says.

No Reciprocity

Juneau-Katsuya says allowing the takeover of oil and gas giant Nexen in 2012 by a Chinese state-owned company despite security concerns voiced by intelligence organizations was most likely the work of China’s agents-of-influence in Canada.

“Now the Chinese, who know very, very well the game of influence and agents-of-influence, have a major pawn in the game in Alberta,” he says.

Any takeover of a major Canadian company by China is increasing China’s influence in Canada, he adds.

“Some people [may say] what’s the difference between the U.S. or Israel or the European countries [buying Canadian companies]? Well, the difference is I can go do business [in those countries] and influence on my way. But in China I won’t be able to do that, they won’t allow me to do this.”

China would never allow a foreign entity gain control of companies within its key sectors, he notes.

“The Chinese see that as [an issue of] national security, and they will not do that.”