Vaccine

The VA policy claims that there's "no scientific or medical evidence" that vaccines issued to servicemembers have resulted in long-term adverse health effects.

Pfizer is among the possible defendants, one lawyer says.

A recipient of the Army's offer described the move as 'misguided and insincere because it is clear that it is only being employed to benefit the Army.'

The deal also includes an independent COVID-19 inquiry scrutinising aspects including the use of multiple lockdowns.

Adverse event was reportedly myocarditis.

Military members are seeking backpay and restoration of benefits.

The contract says the ‘purchaser’ acknowledged that the efficacy and adverse effects of the vaccine were 'not currently known.'

Expansion of office dealing with vaccine injury claims met with praise.

Dr. John Gerrard warns the office of the Chief Health Officer could lose credibility if it overstates the risk of the latest COVID wave.