The written decision—more like a political tract than a legal brief—referenced the Georgia audit. So, before anything else, I asked Favorito about it, wondering if he had something to say about what happened to the man we used to call “America’s mayor.”
Did he ever.
At first, Favorito simply said, “The New York Supreme Court made false assumptions about Georgia on it and used them improperly against Giuliani.”
Then he added: “The State Farm Arena video they showed, I’m sorry, showed clear violations of Georgia law committed by election officials.”
Favorito went silent. I thought that was it—he might even want to pull back—but the opposite was true. He wanted to say something stronger, with more evidence, and later sent me the following two paragraphs via email:
[All bolds are Favorito’s. The italics are direct quotes from the New York State Supreme Court.]
I first met Garland months ago, when we sat together in the aforementioned State Farm Arena watching that hand-count audit of the Georgia vote.
At that time, he got up to show me how one of the several Dominion machines could be connected to the internet by a short ethernet cable to a nearby server. A Dominion representative was standing a few feet away, nodding approvingly.
Favorito is a retired IT (information technology, as we all know by now) professional, now devoting his life to electoral integrity. He is also, from my admittedly few contacts, a thoroughly honest guy of the “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” sort, just the kind of person to put the fear of Jehovah in the Democrats and the #NeverTrumpish Georgia GOP hierarchy, notably Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, both of whom seem headed for the primary chopping block.
The latter is under suspicion for all sorts of covert activities, including having his agents snoop into at least one box of locked ballots without notifying anyone.
Call it Garland versus Garland. I’m going with the first-name variety who also told me during the interview that he has been deluged with more interviews than ever as his appeal draws closer. Many—such as the left-leaning Atlanta Journal-Constitution—are doing their best to discredit him, implying in those interviews that Voter GA has failed, using such minor details as the judge denying the use of high-powered microscopes in the recount (something Favorito says they never wanted in the first place) as evidence of that failure.
But I’ll let Garland (first name) speak for himself:
Favorito tells me it will be another month before the next ruling from the judge. Voter GA, he says, will be taking that time to strategize.
Meanwhile, “Free Rudy!”