Can China’s Xi Keep His Promises of Support to Businesses?

Xi Jinping has promised support for private businesses and fair treatment, but many nonetheless remain skeptical and cautious.
Can China’s Xi Keep His Promises of Support to Businesses?
Women work at a bag manufacturing plant in Linhuan, Anhui Province, China, on Aug. 21, 2025. AFP stringer/AFP via Getty Images
|Updated:
0:00
Commentary

Chinese businesspeople have good reason to harbor mixed feelings about Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s recent encouragement and promises of support. The only just-released text of an important speech he gave to select business leaders in February contains fulsome promises and a willingness to correct past failures.

Such rhetoric would, under most circumstances, be cause for enthusiasm, except that Chinese business owners and managers can recall that not too long ago, Xi and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) had heaped statements of opprobrium on all private businesses in China. Now, hearing Xi sing a very different tune, these business leaders must (or should) wonder what the next turn in his attitude will be.

Xi’s most recent message was clearly designed to create a positive attitude among private business owners and managers, presumably so that they will hire and invest more actively and support Beijings efforts to revive the country’s economy.

He promised “policies and measures to promote the development of the private economy,” insisting that those measures would be “implemented in a solid and thorough manner ... without ambiguity, delay, or compromise.”

He further promised that these commitments would “translate into concrete, substantive assistance [so that] all eligible enterprises of the same category should receive equal treatment.”

Xi even went so far as to acknowledge that in the past, “many private businesses report limited tangible benefits.”

Beijing has good reason to turn to private business. It employs some 80 percent of China’s urban workforce. With export prospects to the United States, Europe, and Japan dimming, Beijing is desperately seeking to rev up the engine of the domestic economy. Those efforts have met with little success so far.

At last measure, in July, retail sales in China were up only 3.7 percent from year-prior levels, a slowdown from the 4.8 percent registered in June. Industrial production in July showed only 5.7 percent growth from year-prior levels, slower than the 6.8 percent recorded in June. Private business is a part of this clear economic problem.

A recent survey showed that some 60 percent of private businesses believed the current environment is “very challenging” and were cutting investments by 1.5 percent from year-prior levels. If the CCPs encouragement can relieve some of those “challenges,” Beijing could have a means to turn the situation around.

Still, there is reason to expect a less-than-enthusiastic response from private businesses. Encouraging as Xi must sound, owners and managers nonetheless have memories of a very different approach not too long ago. In 2021, Xi openly criticized the lack of civic virtue among private businesses, which many American observers described as a “crackdown” not just on private companies but also on individual entrepreneurs, including Alibaba CEO Jack Ma.

During that time, Beijing published guidelines demanding that private businesses abandon the single-minded pursuit of profits and instead “educate private businesspeople to weaponize their minds with socialist ideology.” Xi wanted businesspeople to become “politically sensible” and “firmly listen to the Party and follow the Party.” As recently as 2023, Chinese regulations were described as a way to reduce private power in favor of state-run enterprises.

Aside from such bitter memories of the not-too-distant past, businesspeople have complained that, despite Beijings changed rhetoric and the passage of the Private Economy Protection Law in May, the regimes actions have failed to align with its rhetoric. Local law enforcement, for instance, has failed to offer support when private businesses have tried to collect on payment defaults, especially from state-sponsored enterprises.

Beyond such contradictions in both past and present rhetoric, as well as present actions, Chinese businesses have still other reasons for caution. The men and women in charge of these private enterprises can readily see that it is likely only current economic needs that have changed Xi from what they saw only a couple of years ago. Two to four years ago, when Beijing believed it had little need for help, Xi appeared hostile. Surely, these business managers can see the connection and ask themselves, if they respond positively and the economy strengthens, will Xi return to this former hostility? There are certainly no guarantees that he will not do so.

It is a difficult challenge for Xi and the CCP to get the economy back on track. A more positive attitude among business leaders could do a lot to bring success to Beijing’s economic efforts. Still, if private businesses’ response is only tepid or nonexistent, Xi will only have himself to blame. He overplayed his ideological hand when he and his planners thought (admittedly mistakenly) that things were going well. Now he must overcome the legacy of that error. At best, things will unfold much more slowly than they would have if he had not poisoned the relationship with private businesses in the first place.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Milton Ezrati
Milton Ezrati
Author
Milton Ezrati is a contributing editor at The National Interest, an affiliate of the Center for the Study of Human Capital at the University at Buffalo (SUNY), and chief economist for Vested, a New York-based communications firm. Before joining Vested, he served as chief market strategist and economist for Lord, Abbett & Co. He also writes frequently for City Journal and blogs regularly for Forbes. His latest book is “Thirty Tomorrows: The Next Three Decades of Globalization, Demographics, and How We Will Live.”