Monsanto to Face International ‘Tribunal’ for Alleged Crimes, but Company Says It’s a PR Stunt

By Zack
December 7, 2015 9:40 am Last Updated: December 8, 2015 8:09 am

Monsanto will face an international tribunal for alleged crimes against humanity, but some critics of the measure are calling it a publicity stunt.

A group of environmentalists, activists, and scientists announced the tribunal recently at the UN Conference on Climate Change in Paris.

The action will take place in The Hague, Netherlands in October 2016. 

The crowd-funded group includes Indian activist Vandana Shiva, environmental lawyer Corinne Lepage, and Organic Consumers Association director Ronnie Cummins.

“The time is long overdue for a global citizens’ tribunal to put Monsanto on trial for crimes against humanity and the environment,” Cummins said at the press conference announcing the tribunal. 

“Monsanto is … largely responsible for the depletion of soil and water resources, species extinction and declining biodiversity, and the displacement of millions of small farmers worldwide,” added Shiva.

The group noted that Monsanto, one of the largest industrial agriculture companies in the world, has developed a number of highly toxic products such as the RoundUp herbicide. The group also criticizes Monsanto’s development of genetically modified foods, which they say has caused environmental damage while putting financial pressure on farmers.

This Monday, Aug. 31, 2015 photo shows the Monsanto logo at the Farm Progress Show in Decatur, Ill. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman)
This Monday, Aug. 31, 2015 photo shows the Monsanto logo at the Farm Progress Show in Decatur, Ill. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman)

 

But while some are celebrating the tribunal, critics are dismissing it as a publicity stunt since the tribunal has no authority to actually punish the corporation. The tribunal said its findings could be used for prosecution against the company in the future.

Monsanto’s public affairs team wrote that the tribunal is a “PR stunt.” 

“The pretentious creation of a fake court to ‘try’ Monsanto for its alleged ‘crimes’ reveals the almost universal lack of acceptability of their allegations in any real courts systems,” the team wrote. 

“Monsanto is ready and eager to respond to all questions about our activities and products. Transparency is a vital part of our approach and we would like the public to judge us on the reality of our activities, not some caricature thereof. This fake trial has no legal basis and is an attempt to mislead the public. If its proponents had a real case, they would have taken it to a real existing court system. Monsanto is occasionally taken to court, in fact, and far more often than not mounts a winning defense.”