Professor Mark Woolhouse said supporting lockdown became ‘a test of virtue’ which made debate reasoned and objective debate ‘exceptionally difficult.’
But parents campaign group UsforThem asked why most children’s charities couldn’t ‘advocate strongly for children at the time it would have made a difference.’
Professor Mark Woolhouse said supporting lockdown became ‘a test of virtue’ which made debate reasoned and objective debate ‘exceptionally difficult.’
But parents campaign group UsforThem asked why most children’s charities couldn’t ‘advocate strongly for children at the time it would have made a difference.’