European Commission Seeks More Powers of Oversight

In its attempt to deal with the expanding eurozone crisis, the European Commission proposed on Wednesday a set of radical measures that would transfer power from the elected Parliament to unelected technocrats.
European Commission Seeks More Powers of Oversight
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso speaks during a press conference at the EU headquarters on Nov. 23 in Brussels. (John Thys/AFP/Getty Images)
11/23/2011
Updated:
9/29/2015
<a href="https://www.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2015/07/Barroso.jpg" rel="attachment wp-att-147480"><img class="size-large wp-image-147480" src="https://www.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2015/07/Barroso-632x450.jpg" alt="European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso" width="590" height="420"/></a>
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso

In its attempt to deal with the expanding eurozone crisis, the European Commission proposed on Wednesday a set of radical measures that would transfer power from the elected Parliament to unelected technocrats.

The measures, unveiled by Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, would force eurozone governments to pass their national budgets by the commission—which is unelected—for approval. Furthermore, the EC wants to be able to force eurozone countries to accept bailouts.

Critics argue that this would erode democracy, but the commission defended the move as necessary for the survival of the euro.

“Without stronger economic governance in the eurozone it will be difficult if not impossible to sustain the common currency,” Barroso said at a press conference at the EU headquarters in Brussels.

EU news source euobserver.com called the proposals “unprecedented” and “perhaps the most radical shift in decision making away from parliaments and toward unelected bodies in the history of the European Union.”

It is expected that the move will cause an uproar among euroskeptics who already accuse the union of being too bureaucratic, undemocratic, and weakening the powers of the state.

The two proposals, if adopted, would mean that all 17 eurozone countries would have to submit their draft budget plans to the commission, which would be able to demand changes if the original draft does not comply with the commitments made by the member states. Furthermore, countries that exceed the budget debt and deficit rules would have to submit to enhanced surveillance by the commission. Inspection teams could be sent to countries deemed to be in trouble, whether they like it or not.

The commission would also be able to give recommendations to the Council of Ministers that a country in dire straits should accept a bailout. This would in practice generate such market pressure on that country that it amounts to a direct order, an EU observer argues. This would help ensure bailout packages go through as quickly as possible, versus allowing countries to dither until the situation becomes worse for everyone.

The council is the second legislative body in addition to the Parliament. It is comprised of ministers from member states who represent their national governments.

Olli Rehn, European commissioner for economic and financial affairs elaborated, saying, “The commission will have the right to propose to the council to recommend that a member state request financial assistance. The proposal would be based on the commission’s analysis in line with ... the European Central Bank.”

The left, center-left, and center-right in the European Parliament reacted largely positively to the measures. The center-right European People’s Party group chair Joseph Daul from France called them “good steps in the right direction.”

Others have heavily criticized the proposals as being a step in the wrong direction.

Czech MEP Jan Zahradil, chairman of the Conservatives and Reformists group in the European Parliament, said in a statement on the group’s website that the proposals “undermine national sovereignty” and called them “fiddling with economic governance structures” instead of “focusing on the immediate crisis.”

The Green group’s economic policy spokesperson Philippe Lamberts was even more critical. “The isolated proposals on far-reaching budgetary surveillance and discipline are fundamentally flawed by the complete absence of any democratic check or legitimacy,” he said in a published statement.

Barroso stood firmly by the measures, however. When challenged by journalists, he denied that this shift of power is inherently undemocratic, since the request for closer economic integration came from the member countries in the first place. It is no different than a country transferring power over monetary policy to a central bank, Barroso argued.

“It was their [the eurogroup’s] decision. ... So in terms of democracy, let’s be clear. When democratic member states in full respect of constitutional rules entrust some entities with some powers, this is a fully democratic process and absolutely in respect of democratic principles,” he said.