A federal judge in California has ruled that the Trump administration unlawfully used Marines and National Guard troops in Los Angeles.
Breyer said that the federal government violated a law known as the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prevents the military from engaging in civilian law enforcement.
Gov. Gavin Newsom proclaimed victory in a post to social media, stating that Trump’s “militarization of our streets and use of the military against US citizens is ILLEGAL.”
Acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli responded by stating in part that the military would remain in Los Angeles.
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly denounced the ruling in a statement provided to The Epoch Times. saying the “judge is trying to usurp the authority of the Commander-in-Chief to protect American cities from violence and destruction” and that Trump “saved Los Angeles” from “mass chaos.”
The trial occurred as Trump deployed troops to Washington after declaring a public safety emergency in the capital city and floated the idea of intervening in Chicago’s law enforcement as well. Breyer’s order, which applies only to activity in California, expressed concern that Trump might intervene in Oakland and San Francisco.
“President Trump and [Defense] Secretary [Pete] Hegseth have stated their intention to call National Guard troops into federal service in other cities across the country–including Oakland and San Francisco, here in the Northern District of California—thus creating a national police force with the President as its chief,” Breyer said.
Besides, it said, another section of federal law allows the National Guard to enforce the law. It was referring to Section 12406 of federal law, which allows the president to federalize the National Guard under certain conditions, including if he “is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”
The state of California brought three witnesses on Aug. 11, including Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who led the troops in the state as part of a group called Task Force 51. In their training materials, the task force received a list of activities prohibited under the Posse Comitatus Act, while Hegseth said some activities, such as security patrol and crowd control, were subject to a constitutional exception to the law.
In his decision, Breyer denied that the president enjoys a constitutional exception that would allow him to protect federal property, personnel, and functions.
“This assertion is not grounded in the history of the [Posse Comitatus] Act, Supreme Court jurisprudence on executive authority, or common sense,” he said.
“There is no question that federal personnel should be able to perform their jobs without fearing for their safety. But to use this as a hook to send military troops alongside federal agents wherever they go proves too much and would frustrate the very purpose of the Posse Comitatus Act.”






