Even in the Netherlands—which is certainly no bastion of Catholicism—priests are noticing an increase in young people attending Mass.
While it’s not just the Catholic Church seeing this growth, Catholicism in particular seems to be garnering unexpected interest from the young. In an interview with Fox News, Gen Z influencer Isabel Brown explained that the time-honored traditions and unyielding teachings of the church appeal to young people who feel disillusioned with inauthentic forms of Christianity that sway with the times. Moreover, according to Brown, Catholicism’s teaching that Jesus himself can be directly encountered in the Holy Eucharist offers a real experience of the transcendent that’s especially enticing in a culture given over more and more to the artificial and inauthentic.
“What this really boils down to is a level of relationship and intimacy with Jesus offered through the Holy Eucharist that is unfound anywhere else,” she said.
So the evidence is clear. A religious revival is emerging. The question is, why? To Brown, it’s a natural reaction against what she sees as the evils of the age. She said, “You watch the degradation of marriage, the normalization of transitioning children, abortion by the millions for the most vulnerable in our society over the past several decades, and in the midst this darkness, we’re watching young people run back toward God.”
Eijk identified a thirst for stability and meaning in those newly interested in religion. He said: “The younger generation often lacks a fixed point in their lives. Their lives have no deeper meaning or destination. But questions about meaning arise for everyone, including them.”
“You cannot have a society that exists without meaning for very long,” he said on his podcast, “The Matt Walsh Show.” “A society without meaning will either collapse and be destroyed or it will be revived and it will rediscover meaning.”
The insights of Eijk and Walsh are backed up by the famous research of Austrian psychologist Viktor Frankl, who conducted a careful study of human nature when he was placed in a concentration camp during World War II. Stripped of all the normal vestures of life, all the veneer of civilized life, Frankl’s fellow prisoners presented a stark image of human nature reduced to its essentials. Frankl concluded from studying human behavior in the camp and afterward in his clinical practice that humans are not fundamentally motivated by the desire for power, as Marx taught, nor sexual drive, as Freud insisted, but by an acute need to find meaning in existence.
According to Frankl, it is humanity’s unheard cry for meaning—ignored by a “post-truth” modern society—that causes many modern mental health problems.
Young people today aren’t convinced by the pseudo-meaning dished up by contemporary society, the appetizing yet ultimately substanceless consumerism, hedonism, secularism, and individualism. So they’re turning to the force that provided meaning for generation upon generation of our ancestors: religion.
Part of the meaning furnished from religion involves a sense of belonging. Younger generations want to belong to something bigger than themselves. The Western cult of unchecked individualism and personal freedom has turned out to be a rather lonely and unfulfilling path for many, and might explain, too, on the other end of the spectrum, the rush to find an identity within LGBT and similar groups.
“Many young people have turned to religion to find community and connection after the isolating years of the pandemic, which hit Gen Z harder than most,” the Axios article theorizes.
During COVID-19, many people’s primary connection to the wider world was the internet. Gen Z is among the first generations to grow up, more or less, with the internet and to be shaped by it. That upbringing has come with its own set of problems. But it has also been, ironically, a path to a more authentic experience of life for many of these “digital natives.”
The internet has allowed people to forge—or rather, rediscover—certain intellectual paths that are “far from the madding crowd.” The internet provided an alternative to mainstream culture, which—during the really heavy years of decline in religiosity—was more narrowly controlled and more uniform via television, radio, Hollywood, and the music industry. All of these cultural media were transmitting a strong secular message. But the internet, for all of its problems, has now opened up myriad forms of alternative information and entertainment, allowing more traditional, less mainstream messages to get through in a way they probably didn’t a generation ago.
Where and how far will this new wind blow? It’s impossible to say. But for those who long for a restoration of tradition in America and some kind of bulwark against the further erosion of values once held sacred in our country—especially religious ones—this wind bears a scent of hope. As the younger generation begins to replace the older one in posts of influence, their beliefs will become increasingly the beliefs of the institutions that make up society and their priorities the priorities of culture. If current data are any indicator, those priorities will be faithful to traditional religious belief, which could signal a wholesale cultural revolution—or, more accurately, restoration.
As Brown put it, “God’s not done with American culture yet.”







