Trump Trial’s Salacious Statements Never Should Have Happened: Experts

A judge allowed prosecutors to put on testimony unrelated to the accusations against former President Donald Trump, igniting concerns about inflaming the jury.
Trump Trial’s Salacious Statements Never Should Have Happened: Experts
Stormy Daniels leaves Manhattan Criminal Court after testifying at former U.S. President Donald Trump's trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments linked to extramarital affairs, in New York City, on May 9, 2024. Charly Triballeau /AFP via Getty Images
Janice Hisle
Updated:
0:00

This week’s testimony of an adult film actress against former President Donald Trump was headline-grabbing and gasp-inspiring. It also never should have been permitted, legal analysts say.

“It’s shameful that the judge allowed it,” Phill Kline, a Liberty University law professor and former Kansas attorney general, told The Epoch Times.
Janice Hisle
Janice Hisle
Reporter
Janice Hisle mainly writes in-depth reports based on U.S. political news and cultural trends, following a two-year stint covering President Donald Trump’s 2024 reelection campaign. Before joining The Epoch Times in 2022, she worked more than two decades as a reporter for newspapers in Ohio and authored several books. She is a graduate of Kent State University's journalism program. You can reach Janice at: [email protected]
twitter
truth