Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Restricting Warrantless Searches During Potential Emergencies

The case focused on the Fourth Amendment and whether officers needed probable cause in certain situations.
Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Restricting Warrantless Searches During Potential Emergencies
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Sept. 29, 2025. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch Times
Sam Dorman
Sam Dorman
Washington Correspondent
|Updated:
0:00

The Supreme Court seemed skeptical of arguments on Oct. 15 that officers should have probable cause before entering someone’s home during a potential emergency.

Instead, the justices seemed sympathetic to police officers’ decision to enter the home of a Montana man who was thought to be on the brink of suicide. Oral argument in the case, known as Case v. Montana, focused on the level of suspicion or certainty authorities should have under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution when confronting that type of situation.

Sam Dorman
Sam Dorman
Washington Correspondent
Sam Dorman is a Washington correspondent covering courts and politics for The Epoch Times. You can follow him on X at @EpochofDorman.
twitter