The Progressive Curriculum: Rhetoric Versus Reality

The Progressive Curriculum: Rhetoric Versus Reality
Some policy experts blame the continuing influence of John Dewey’s progressive theories for why so many high school students are underprepared for university. Jannis Tobias Werner/Shutterstock
David Livingstone
Updated:

In 1953, historian and educator Hilda Neatby ignited controversy by publishing “So Little for the Mind: An Indictment of Canadian Education.” She wanted to know why otherwise bright high school students entering her classes lacked the reading, writing, and thinking skills necessary for university. And why were the more recent high school graduates faring the worst?

Neatby ultimately pinned the blame on John Dewey’s progressive theories of education. “Dewey more than any other single person must be held responsible for the intellectual, cultural, and moral poverty of much modern teaching,” she wrote.

David Livingstone
David Livingstone
Author
David W. Livingstone, Ph.D., is a professor in the Liberal Studies and Political Studies departments at Vancouver Island University. He has published articles and book reviews on a variety of topics, including Abraham Lincoln’s statesmanship, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s political philosophy, and Thomas D’Arcy McGee’s contribution to Canadian confederation.
Related Topics