Viewpoints
Opinion

Reasons for the Three-Fifths Compromise

Reasons for the Three-Fifths Compromise
In Philadelphia (From L–R): the Old City Hall, where the Supreme Court sat from 1790 until 1800; Independence Hall, where the Constitution was written; and Congress Hall, where Congress sat from 1790 until 1800, while the city was the capital of the United States. MPI/Getty Images
|Updated:
0:00
When arguing that the Constitution stems from, and continues to reflect, “systemic racism,” critics point to Article I, Section 2, Clause 3—the “three-fifths compromise.”  They do so even though the three-fifths compromise was amended out of the document more than 150 years ago.
By way of illustration, a 2011 Time magazine cover story asserted, “The framers ... gave us the idea that a black person was three-fifths of a human being.” In 2021, Time doubled down with a column stating that “the Constitution defined African-Americans as only three-fifths of a person.” Similarly, a Teen Vogue item misinformed its young readers with these words:
Rob Natelson
Rob Natelson
Author
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor who is senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver, authored “The Original Constitution” (4th ed., 2025). He is a contributor to The Heritage Foundation’s “Heritage Guide to the Constitution.” He also researched and wrote the scholarly article “Virgil and the Constitution,” whose publication is pending in Regent University Law Review.
Related Topics