Flags are powerful symbols for nations, causes, ethnic communities, and sports teams. They can unify people, and they can be flashpoints for conflict. The placement of a flag often symbolizes an assertion of possession of a piece of land, as seen in the famous Iwo Jima flag-raising in World War II or by astronauts planting a flag on the moon.
Because of the depth and gravity of displaying flags, perhaps it’s time that Canadian civic institutions halted their practice of raising flags at the behest of different groups. It has been leading to division and conflict that shouldn’t be taking place on the steps of municipal buildings.
There would be a cost in ending these events, however. In cases where flag raising doesn’t involve countries in conflict, it can be a unifying and educational event in cities with diverse populations. It can give new citizens a sense of belonging and is an act of civil participation in a world where it’s dearly lacking. Some groups are sure to be upset, and court challenges could conceivably result.
There would be benefits to ending the flag raisings, though.
Mayors and councillors in municipal jurisdictions are notorious for stepping well outside of their mandate. Local elected officials shouldn’t be poking their noses into complex, international conflicts that don’t have a direct impact on the communities they represent. Time in council chambers is limited, and citizens would prefer their representatives spent that time constructing and debating policies involving road construction, community zoning, and trash pickup rather than miring themselves in debates over foreign conflicts. Getting the flag issue off the table could help them focus.
There would be savings in resources for both city halls and community groups if the flag raisings ended. City personnel and time are dedicated to these constant ceremonies, while groups wanting their flags raised spend time and money petitioning to do so. Tax dollars could be saved while community groups could dedicate their funds and resources more inward for their causes. The city council and administrators should focus on the city’s needs rather than on various causes.
Mayors and councillors are tasked with representing a diverse array of constituents. An appearance of impartiality is essential to effectively fulfill their elected roles. To try to cherry-pick between what may be considered appropriate flags and which may not would lead to unbearable bias and battles. With flags, it must be all or none, and the latter route is the clearer path to resolution.
The battles between religious and ethnic communities in Canada won’t stop just because their flags will no longer be hoisted on public property. But they won’t be drawn to city halls any longer, and local governments can stick to their mandates more easily.
In a perfect world, everybody would raise their flag and respect the rights of other communities to do so. Alas, we are not in such a place yet.







