Viewpoints
Opinion

Cory Morgan: Amid Unity Crisis, Premiers Must Choose Their Words Carefully When It Comes to Alberta

Cory Morgan: Amid Unity Crisis, Premiers Must Choose Their Words Carefully When It Comes to Alberta
Canada's premiers prepare to meet at the Council of the Federation meeting in Charlottetown on July 22, 2026. The Canadian Press/Darren Calabrese
|Updated:
0:00
Commentary

Alberta is going through a very politically sensitive period. The independence referendum to be held on Oct. 19 is not binding, but it could lead to the province progressing toward an official, Clarity Act-compliant referendum on secession.

Polling indicates that support for secession in Alberta remains at around 30 percent. Still, polling has also found that over half of Albertans feel they are getting a “raw deal” being part of Canada. That alienation could quickly evolve into separatism and premiers in other provinces could contribute to such a shift, even if inadvertently.
The annual premiers’ gathering in Charlottetown was focused primarily on dealing with the ongoing tariff battles with the United States. National unity, particularly with regard to Alberta, loomed in the background, though, and the issues overlapped as some premiers mused about using Western Canadian resources as leverage against the USA in the trade war. The notion wasn’t well received by Western premiers.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford was the bluntest, saying: “I’m going to be very clear — the potash, the oil … they need to feel the pain rather than us constantly feeling the pain.”

While Ford didn’t name the provinces, in listing oil and potash he makes it clear he is speaking of Alberta and Saskatchewan. He implied the Western provinces weren’t carrying their weight in the federation and, to use an analogy of wanting to see shared pain, he sounded almost spiteful. His comments infuriated many Albertans, particularly coming from the premier of a province that’s a net recipient of equalization.

Premiers Scott Moe and Danielle Smith were quick to respond to Ford’s statements, with Smith tersely stating, “That’s not going to happen.”

Unconstrained by holding elected office any longer, former Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall didn’t hold back when he posted on social media, “Doug Ford said today that if the ‘provinces were united’ we could ‘dismantle’ the US. How could [Canada] fight this fight ... ?”

“Energy and potash are the only specific examples he cites. So, his response to US tariffs killing Canadian jobs is to kill western [Canadian] jobs? The cost of the retaliatory trade war he demands would be born by western Canadian industries and workers. No sir.”

The damage has been done, though. Albertans are nervous that their resources could be used as a tool to put pressure on the United States, and it would be done by distant, Eastern leaders. Prime Minister Carney didn’t sound averse to using the tactics suggested by Ford when he said, “Everything is on the table.”
Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew, New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt, and P.E.I. Premier Rob Lantz all spoke of a unified “Team Canada” approach that could involve using Western resources for trade leverage. If tariffs are applied to Alberta’s oil exports or efforts are made to force the province to curtail production and sales, Albertans will not feel like a part of Team Canada at all. They will feel misused, and not for the first time. Pierre Trudeau’s National Energy Program from the 1980s still hasn’t been forgotten.

Politicians from outside of Alberta must take care even when they think they may be aiding the cause of unity. What looks like constructive advice from Toronto, Ottawa, or Victoria can sound, on the ground in Calgary or Red Deer, like unsolicited moralizing from people who do not live with the consequences of federal climate policy or equalization formulas. Well-meaning statements that dismiss Alberta’s frustrations as exaggerated or temporary only deepen the sense that the rest of the country is not listening.

The outside concern over Alberta’s place in the federation is surely heartfelt and genuine. Albertans see this as a domestic issue to be addressed by its own citizens, however. Quebecers weren’t receptive to hearing the thoughts from people in other provinces while they considered independence in the 1995 referendum, and had Western premiers been insulting or chimed in on how they felt Quebecers should vote, the outcome of the referendum could have been different.

Premiers can and must speak on national issues. They also must tread carefully when it comes to speaking about the unity question in Alberta. The responsible course is restraint and respect. They should recognize that the people best positioned to decide Alberta’s future are Albertans themselves. Intervention from outside only strengthens the argument that the current federation does not treat the province as a full partner.

Over the coming months, Canada’s premiers would do well to speak less, listen more, and resist the temptation to turn Alberta’s internal conversation into a national spectacle leading to an outcome which could be the beginning of the end of the federation.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.