CCP Documents Reveal Its Socialist Rule of Law

By Sophia Lam
Sophia Lam
Sophia Lam
and Mary Hong
Mary Hong
Mary Hong
July 1, 2021 Updated: July 1, 2021

The Epoch Times has recently obtained a report written by a Chinese legal expert summarizing the construction of socialist rule of law in China. It reveals the history of the CCP’s (Chinese Communist Party’s) legal systems and its rule of China by man instead of by law since 1949.

On June 17, 2013, Xu Xianming, then-vice president of the China Law Society and president of Shandong University, gave a special report (pdf) titled “Review and Prospects of the Rule of Law in China” at a training session for the cadres of the law societies at the prefectural and municipal levels.

Xu’s report states that the regime developed its regulations, laws, and legal systems based on communist ideology. According to Xu, from 1949 to 2013, the CCP’s rule of law had experienced stages of initial establishment, destruction, restoration, and development.

Xu is currently the deputy chairman of the Supervisory and Judicial Affairs Committee of the CCP’s rubber-stamp legislature.

The CCP’s Rule of Law Has Always Been Rule of ‘Instructions’ and ‘Opinions’

Establishment: 1949–1956

The CCP’s legal system started from “Instructions,” some in the written form and some orally, as revealed by Xu in his report.

According to Xu’s report, in February 1949, the CCP’s central committee issued “Instructions of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee Relating to Abolishing the Complete Six Laws of the Kuomintang [KMT] and Establishing Judicial Principles for the Liberated Areas” (the Instructions), and it “was the beginning of the socialist concept of rule of law.”

The Complete Six Laws, which are also known as the Complete Six Codes, established by the Kuomintang (Nationalist Party of China) before 1949, included the Constitution, the Civil Code, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Administrative Laws, and the Military Laws.

How did the CCP establish its own legal system after demolishing the existing law of the Republic of China?

The Instructions state, “If there is a law, follow the law; if there is no law, follow the policies; if there is neither a law nor a policy, follow the socialist legal ideology.”

Epoch Times Photo
An angry Chinese man (middle R) is heckled and taken away by a plain-clothes militiaman (middle L) after trying to roll out and paste his hand-written placard or dazibao on the “dazibao wall” (background) in front of the Municipal Revolutionary Committee of Beijing in Beijing, China, in July 1974. Dazibaos were the only means for people to express their opinions. (Serge Romensky/AFP via Getty Images)

The Instructions further require that cadres be taught to master Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought: “The judicial and legal organs should always educate and reform their judicial and legal cadres with the spirit of disrespecting and criticizing the Six Laws and all other reactionary laws and decrees of the KMT, with the spirit of disrespecting and criticizing all anti-people laws and decrees of the capitalist countries of Europe, America, and Japan. To achieve the goal of educating and reforming the cadres, they should be required to study and master the Marxism-Leninism-Mao Zedong Thought’s view of the state and the laws, policies, decrees, orders, regulations, and resolutions of the New Democracy [put forward by Mao].”

In other words, in the initial stage of the CCP’s legal system, the rule of law in China was primarily the party line of the CCP including its policies and ideology.

China’s first constitution under the CCP’s rule took effect in 1954, hence the name “1954 Constitution.” It was hailed by Xu in his report as “the highest achievement” in the initial stage of the CCP’s construction of its legal system. Mao personally oversaw the entire drafting process of the 1954 Constitution.

Destruction: 1957–Cultural Revolution

Mao soon became unhappy about the law and said: “The law always binds people’s hands and feet, but what we need now is to free our hands and feet. So [we] must break the bondage of the law,” according to Xu’s report.

Epoch Times Photo
Young Chinese people demonstrate during the “great proletarian Cultural Revolution” in front of the French embassy, in Beijing, China, in January 1967. Since the Cultural Revolution was launched in May 1966 at Beijing University, Mao’s aim was to recapture power after the failure of the “Great Leap Forward.” The movement was directed against those “party leaders in authority taking the capitalist road.” (Jean Vincent/AFP via Getty Images)

In 1956, Mao initiated “The Hundred Flowers Campaign,” which was an effort—as some observers noted—to identify, persecute, and silence critics of the CCP. Under this campaign, Chinese citizens were encouraged to express openly their opinions of the Communist Party. When people started to voice their opinions of the CCP, Mao cracked down on them, depriving them of their jobs, sending them to labor camps, and labeling them as “rightists.” The “Anti-Rightist Movement” then started in 1957.

As reported by The Epoch Times Chinese edition on Sept. 26, 2019, the CCP’s public information shows that in 1957, more than 3 million “rightist” intellectuals were persecuted nationwide. By 1978, the rightist label was removed from 550,000 intellectuals, leaving only 5,000 with the label. The other more than 2 million intellectuals that were persecuted during the anti-rightist campaigns remain missing. What happened to them? Where did they go?

Zhu Zheng, the author of the book “Year of Dingyou: On the CCP’s Anti-Rightist Struggle,” personally experienced and survived the Anti-Rightist Movement, in 1957, or year of Dingyou in the traditional Chinese calendar. He calls that year “a time of ‘disappearance’ of contemporary Chinese intellectuals.”

With the disappearance of the intellectual elite class, no one dared to oppose the opinions of the CCP or its leaders. In 1958, Mao launched “The Great Leap Forward” movement to “catch up with the UK and surpass the U.S.,” which led China into a great famine that killed 45 million Chinese people between 1958 and 1962, according to historian Frank Dikötter in his book “Mao’s Great Famine.”

In 1962, Mao, fearing that he was losing control—because of the opposition within the CCP after his political campaigns caused the numerous deaths—put forward something different. He said, “It seems that it doesn’t work without law. But we have our practice,” according to Xu’s report.

“Our practice” refers to the process of using internal documents passed around at CCP meetings as law. The report noted that it was the beginning of the legitimization of CCP internal documents as laws. Since then, CCP leaders and cadres have followed internal documents in their work and life, while the public follows editorials of the state-run People’s Daily as their guiding principles.

Mao said in 1958: “What we need is the rule of man, not the rule of law. One editorial in the People’s Daily, [what the CCP states in the editorial] will be implemented nationwide. Why bother with the need for any law?”

Restoration: 1978 (after Cultural Revolution)—1997

In 1989, Deng Xiaoping, the top leader of the CCP, gave the order to kill student protesters in Tiananmen Square. Sources say this was an oral order and Deng said, “Even if at the cost of 200,000 lives, it will be worth it in order to get 20 years of stability.” According to the sources, in April 1989, Deng summoned then-premier Li Peng, then-Party Secretary of Beijing Li Ximing, and then-mayor of Beijing Chen Xitong, to his home.

This statement is not seen in the official “Resolution on the Suppression of Unrest and the Quelling of Anti-revolutionary Riots” passed by the CCP’s rubber-stamp legislature on July 6, 1989.

In this June 4, 1989, photo a rickshaw driver peddles wounded people, with the help of bystanders, to a nearby hospital in Beijing after they were injured during clashes with Chinese soldiers in Tiananmen Square. The crackdown ended a period of relative political openness, led to the downfall of Communist Party leader Zhao Ziyang and plunged Beijing into diplomatic isolation that lasted until the late 1990s. (AP Photo/Liu Heung Shing)
A rickshaw driver peddles wounded people, with the help of bystanders, to a nearby hospital after they were injured during clashes with Chinese soldiers at Tiananmen Square in Beijing, China, on June 4, 1989. The crackdown ended a period of relative political openness and led to the downfall of Communist Party leader Zhao Ziyang. (Liu Heung Shing/AP Photo)

Before the 1989 suppression of the Tiananmen protest, Deng had personally initiated the 1983 “Stern Blow” (also known as “Strike Hard”) Anti-crime Campaign. The campaign is described as “the bloodiest chapter in post-Mao Chinese politics” by Murray Scot Tanner, professor of Chinese and East Asian Politics, Western Michigan University, in his research article “State Coercion and the Balance of Awe: The 1983–1986 ‘Stern Blows’ Anti-crime Campaign,” published in 2000.

According to a CCP report (pdf), during the three-year campaign, 1,772,000 people were arrested, 1,747,000 were sentenced, and 24,000 were executed across the country.

Development: 1997–2004

After the 15th National Congress of the CCP in 1997, the regime stepped into the so-called “development of socialist rule of law.”

Documents Reveal Jiang Zemin’s Manipulation of Laws to Persecute Falun Gong

Since 2006, when The Epoch Times first exposed the CCP’s live organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners, numerous international medical organizations, human rights lawyers, and investigators from many countries have conducted independent investigations in this regard.

Falun Gong, also known as Falun Dafa, is an ancient Chinese spiritual practice consisting of simple, slow-moving meditation exercises and teachings based on the principles of truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance. It grew in popularity during the 1990s, with 70 million to 100 million adherents in China by the end of the decade, according to official estimates at the time.

Feeling threatened by its popularity, the CCP launched a systematic elimination campaign in July 1999. Since then, millions have been detained inside prisons, labor camps, and other facilities, with hundreds of thousands tortured while incarcerated, according to the Falun Dafa Information Center.

In 2019, China Tribunal, an independent people’s tribunal deliberated over documents from more than a year’s investigation of forced organ harvesting in China. It came to the “unavoidable final conclusion (pdf)” that “forced organ harvesting has been committed for years throughout China on a significant scale and that Falun Gong practitioners have been one—and probably the main—source of organ supply.”

The genocide started with only a statement by then-CCP leader Jiang Zemin in a written interview with the French newspaper Le Figaro. On Oct. 25, 1999, Jiang told the French media that Falun Gong is an “evil cult,” and five days later, the CCP’s rubber-stamp legislature issued the “Resolution on Banning Heretic Cult Organizations, Guarding against and Punishing Heretic Cult Activities,” which the CCP claims to be the main “legal basis” for its persecution of Falun Gong.

Last year, The Epoch Times obtained exclusive access to a judicial opinion, classified as “top confidentiality,” and jointly issued by the CCP’s Supreme Court, the Supreme Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of State Security, and the Ministry of Justice on Nov. 30, 2000.

Epoch Times Photo
A screenshot of the opinion. (Screenshot/The Epoch Times)

It is stated in the Opinion that “political and legal departments at all levels should firmly implement” the important instructions of Jiang to persecute Falun Gong. The five judiciary ministries or institutions of the CCP not only fabricated numerous charges against Falun Gong practitioners for their beliefs, but also claimed that the handling of cases involving Falun Gong practitioners is “highly political, legal, and policy-oriented,” requiring “close cooperation among the political and legal departments at all levels under the unified leadership of the Party Committee.”

Liu Ping (pseudonym), a Chinese lawyer, was shocked upon reading the Opinion.

“This is evidence that the CCP is guilty of genocide!” Liu exclaimed. He said that the issuance of this document by the five CCP legal institutions is itself a violation of the law because there is no law authorizing them to legislate.

The Epoch Times Chinese edition reported on this document and interviewed the lawyer on Oct. 22, 2020.

In addition, a number of public documents, including those quoted in the book “A True Jiang Zemin” and in the investigation report published by the World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (WOIFG), reveal how Jiang manipulated the law and the entire state apparatus to persecute Falun Gong, despite the opposition of other Politburo Standing Committee members. Jiang set up an extrajudicial organization called the “610 Office” for the sole purpose of persecuting Falun Gong and made up relevant laws to endorse his persecution.

Documents Reveal the CCP’s Rule of Law Targets Both Chinese and Foreign Countries

A recent example of the CCP’s rule of law is the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law, which was passed by the CCP’s rubber-stamp legislature on June 10. The purpose of the law is to counter Western sanctions, primarily those of the United States.

Chinese leader Xi Jinping “officially” introduced the law in November 2020 during a speech delivered at the Central Working Conference on the Comprehensive Rule of Law. He instructed that “we should strengthen the rule of law and make use of the means of the law” and “make comprehensive use of legislation, law enforcement, and justice to carry out the struggle.” Therefore, following Xi’s speech, in March 2021, the CCP’s rubber-stamp legislature decided to work on this and quickly passed the legislation in June.

China current affairs commentator Li Linyi told The Epoch Times Chinese edition in an interview: “The documents exposed by The Epoch Times reveal that the CCP’s laws are the product of the leadership’s instructions, the CCP’s internal documents, and other confidential documents summarizing its construction of rule of law, which proves that ruling the country by law has been a lie of the CCP.”

Long Tengyun contributed to this report.

Sophia Lam
Sophia Lam
Mary Hong
Mary Hong