This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
5 Takeaways From Supreme Court’s Decision That Allows Ban on Gender Procedures for Minors
The Supreme Court in Washington on June 3, 2025. On June 18, the Court issued a major decision in the case United States v. Skrmetti, upholding Tennessee’s ban on so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors, including puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
The Supreme Court in Washington on June 3, 2025. On June 18, the Court issued a major decision in the case United States v. Skrmetti, upholding Tennessee’s ban on so-called “gender-affirming care” for minors, including puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
Premium Reports

5 Takeaways From Supreme Court’s Decision That Allows Ban on Gender Procedures for Minors

The court’s 6–3 ruling means other states that have passed or considered laws similar to Tennessee’s will likely survive legal challenges.
Premium Reports

5 Takeaways From Supreme Court’s Decision That Allows Ban on Gender Procedures for Minors

The court’s 6–3 ruling means other states that have passed or considered laws similar to Tennessee’s will likely survive legal challenges.
FacebookXTruthGettrLinkedInTelegramEmail
Add to My List
Save
By Sam Dorman, Matthew Vadum
|
June 18, 2025Updated:June 19, 2025

The Supreme Court has issued a major decision upholding Tennessee’s ban on so-called gender-affirming care, such as puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, for minors. Its decision on June 18 will likely influence how states craft legislation and how other gender-related cases unfold in the legal system.

In the case United States v. Skrmetti, a majority of the justices disagreed with the Biden administration’s argument that Tennessee’s law should undergo more rigorous scrutiny in the courts. Instead, Chief Justice John Roberts said in his majority opinion that courts should apply a less rigorous standard known as rational basis, under which states have to show that their law is rationally related to a state interest.

More Premium Reports
see more
Women Report Being Tricked and Bullied Into Taking Abortion Pills
Women Report Being Tricked and Bullied Into Taking Abortion Pills
Impending Showdown With Communist Cuba Is Decades in the Making
Impending Showdown With Communist Cuba Is Decades in the Making
INFOGRAPHIC: Old Glory–The History of Our Nation’s Flag
INFOGRAPHIC: Old Glory–The History of Our Nation’s Flag
US Attorney on Prosecuting Election Fraud in California
US Attorney on Prosecuting Election Fraud in California
Behind the Trump–Xi Handshake, an Architecture of Distrust
Behind the Trump–Xi Handshake, an Architecture of Distrust
Why a Key Immigration Detention Policy Might Hit Supreme Court
Why a Key Immigration Detention Policy Might Hit Supreme Court
SNAP Benefits Go to 186,000 Dead People–And Stopping Them Might Be Difficult
SNAP Benefits Go to 186,000 Dead People–And Stopping Them Might Be Difficult
US Begins to Tackle Commercial Maritime Lag as China Hogs Supply Chains
US Begins to Tackle Commercial Maritime Lag as China Hogs Supply Chains
How a Tiny Insect Decimated Florida’s Citrus, and What Orchardists Are Doing About It
How a Tiny Insect Decimated Florida’s Citrus, and What Orchardists Are Doing About It
Don’t Say ‘Can’t’ to Jessica Cox. The Pilot With No Arms Says ‘Watch Me.’
Don’t Say ‘Can’t’ to Jessica Cox. The Pilot With No Arms Says ‘Watch Me.’
AD
Add to My List
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.