Conservative MPs are questioning why chief public health officer isn’t directly answering questions on whether consuming illegal fentanyl is safe.
The newly appointed Chief Public Health Officer Joss Reimer faced questions from MPs as she appeared before the parliamentary health committee on April 30, less than a month after taking on the role.
During the meeting, Conservative MP Dan Mazier asked Reimer, “Is consuming illegal fentanyl safe, yes or no?”
“The toxic drug crisis is a complex situation, and it requires a complex response,” Reimer replied.
As Mazier repeatedly asked her to clarify her stance on fentanyl injection, Reimer said “there are risks associated with” both legal and illegal substances and the Public Health Agency of Canada tries to provide the “safest options” for Canadians.
“The toxic drug crisis is a complex issue, of which supervised consumption is one area that we need to use in our response,” she added.
“Why do you not feel able to make that recommendation?” he asked.
The Conservative Party opposes supervised injection sites and instead supports a recovery-focused approach to addiction treatment. Supporters of the harm-reduction model argue that approaches such as safe injection sites help reduce overdose deaths and lessen the stigma associated with addiction.

Pandemic
Conservatives clashed on other issues with Reimer during the committee meeting, including public health’s handling of the pandemic.When Strauss asked why vaccination rates for measles went down, Reimer said many Canadians were distressed during the COVID-19 pandemic because of the “decisions that public health made, whether those were the right or wrong decisions.” Reimer said many Canadians lost their jobs and access to friends and family, while other Canadians lost loved ones.
Reimer said while public health professionals did not “function perfectly,” they made the best decisions they could with the information they had at the time.
Stauss told Reimer that some Canadians had told him of their mistrust of COVID-19 vaccines and anger with vaccine mandates. He said the COVID-19 vaccine’s risks appeared to outweigh the benefits for many young Canadians.
“I think that is a source of profound and ongoing loss of trust. And until that’s acknowledged, I don’t see that being repaired. So I'd like to know what reflections you have on that,” he said.
Reimer said she appreciated Strauss’s comments, and acknowledged it was a “really difficult time” for everyone. Reimer said all public health decisions at the community level can benefit some groups of people to the detriment of others, “and that’s a difficult balance to make.”
“I know the Public Health Agency of Canada takes very seriously that the decisions that we need to make will always need to balance benefits and risks for all Canadians, and that’s what makes the job difficult, but also what makes it so important,” she said.







