Scam Prevention Bill Sparks Debate Over Delays, Effectiveness

Opposition criticised the government for rushing consultation resulting in a complex, unclear framework that disadvantages consumers.
Scam Prevention Bill Sparks Debate Over Delays, Effectiveness
When is sounds too good to be true, it's a scam. NONGASIMO/Shutterstock
Naziya Alvi Rahman
Updated:
0:00

The Opposition criticised the Albanese government’s proposed anti-scam legislation, describing it as rushed and incomplete.

Speaking in Parliament, Liberal MP Luke Howarth highlighted the absence of sector-specific mandatory codes and a straightforward mechanism for consumer redress.

“The concept of a scams prevention framework is broadly supported by all stakeholders, including banks, telcos, and digital platforms,” he said.

However, he argued that the bill’s most critical protections remain undrafted.

“[It] is unlikely that the full framework will be operational before the next election,” he said.

Howarth also accused the government of rushing the consultation process, giving stakeholders only three weeks to review the draft legislation.

“The bill has been described as rushed, heavy handed, complex, unclear, and stacked against consumers,” he said.

On Nov. 7, the proposed anti-scam bill was introduced to bring in tougher rules for businesses, requiring them to actively monitor and prevent scams.

It grants regulators, including the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), greater oversight, with penalties of up to $50 million (US$33 million) for non-compliance.

Financial institutions would be mandated to enhance transaction checks, while digital platforms must verify advertisers more rigorously.

Naziya Alvi Rahman
Naziya Alvi Rahman
Author
Naziya Alvi Rahman is a Canberra-based journalist who covers political issues in Australia. She can be reached at [email protected].
Related Topics