The Queensland state government is proposing to remove strict diversity quotas from the Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (OCOG).
The move follows recommendations to streamline processes around governance in the lead-up to the 2032 Brisbane Olympics.
One of the key recommendations in that report was to “review and streamline strategic governance groups to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of decision making.”
A sub-recommendation was to reduce the size of the board.
In addressing the need to streamline corporate governance arrangements, the state has suggested “removing certain processes, criteria and waiting periods for the appointment of nominated directors.”

Under the existing Queensland government policy, the board would be instructed to ensure half its members are women, with at least one member being of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander background.
The Epoch Times understands, however, that the removal of a requirement for diversity does not override the requirement for diversity to be considered in appointing board directors—that guideline will remain.
A spokesperson for the Minister for the Olympic and Paralympic Games Tim Mander told The Epoch Times the Liberal National Party was “getting on with the job of delivering a winning legacy for Queensland.”
“The Crisafulli government has accepted the recommendation of the independent 100 Day Review of the Games to streamline governance arrangements,” the spokesperson said.
“The Act is currently before the State Development, Infrastructure and Works Committee.”
Police Refuse Quotas
The proposed amendment comes just months after the Queensland Police Service (QPS) announced it would refuse a number of recommendations around diversity quotas.A Queensland Human Rights Commission report outlined 36 recommendations on dealing with barriers for women, Indigenous people or “culturally diverse” individuals.
The QPS accepted some recommendations but rejected several others.
One of the recommendations rejected by the QPS was to “make leadership support visible,” which would have involved “taking significant steps towards diversity targets for sworn Executive Leadership Team members.”
Another rejected recommendation was around consulting with “diverse members” to identify their preferred performance indicators.






