Federal Procurement Ombud Alexander Jeglic said a review of procurement practices found numerous instances of “bait and switch” in government contracts, where companies receive contracts based on their current employees and then switch them with less qualified personnel that perform the actual work.
“However, in some cases, replacement resources did not meet or exceed the qualifications of the original resource proposed to secure the bid,” the office said, adding that this raises questions about “the selection of the winning supplier and the fairness of the procurement process.”
The report stated that “bait and switch” tactics can be considered a violation of procurement rules and can even be considered to be fraud if the supplier “never intended to use the resources they originally proposed.”
The ombud noted that PSPC has made policy changes that effectively eliminate the use of “bait and switch” tactics by discontinuing the process of evaluating the qualification of proposed resources as part of the bid evaluation process.
However, the report said it was “unclear” why PSPC did not choose to merely strengthen existing controls. It also raised concerns about small and medium-sized businesses not being able to successfully participate in the processes if they do not have a track record of past contracts.
The report said that while PSPC’s decision to stop evaluating the experience and qualifications of resources will eliminate the issue of “bait and switch,” it does “little to achieve for the department the quality of product it bargained and paid for.”
The PSPC sent a response to the ombud’s office, which was included in the report, that requested the office to remove this criticism. The department said that several paragraphs in the report were “speculative and out of the review’s scope,” are not supported by data and information obtained by the office, and should not be made public. The ombud’s office said it noted this response but decided to include the paragraphs.
Jeglic said a follow-up review will be conducted in two years to assess whether the federal departments have implemented his recommendations.







