Prime Minister’s $4 Million Cliffside Property Sparks Criticism Amid Housing Crisis

Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones defended the prime minister, saying that the focus should be on housing policy, not on his personal property purchase.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese speaks to locals after touring a newly built community housing unit at Binjari near Katherine, Northern Territory on March 12, 2024. AAP Image/Lukas Coch

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s recent purchase of a luxurious four-bedroom home on the Copacabana cliffside has ignited debate in political circles and the broader public.

With sweeping ocean views and a distant glimpse of Sydney’s skyline, the $4.3 million (US$2.8 million) property has become a symbol of the growing divide between Australia’s political class and ordinary citizens struggling to break into the housing market.

The timing of the purchase, amid a worsening housing crisis, has drawn sharp criticism from opposition figures and even some within his own party.

A Personal Matter?

While Albanese and his fiancée have stated that this is a personal matter—a home bought ahead of their upcoming marriage—political commentators and opponents argue that the symbolism is too significant to ignore.

In a political landscape where optics can often overshadow substance, the decision to buy a high-end property at a time of severe housing unaffordability is being seen by some as a potential misstep.

Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones has come out in defence of the prime minister, saying that the real focus should remain on the government’s housing policy rather than the personal decisions of its leader.

“The housing policy that we’re focused on is our Help to Buy scheme, which is blocked in the Senate,” Jones said in a radio interview.

He acknowledged that while privacy is important, scrutiny is part and parcel of high office, but reiterated that the housing crisis needs real, substantive solutions, not distractions.

Opposition’s Criticism

Unsurprisingly, opposition figures have also chimed in on the controversy.

Deputy Opposition Leader Sussan Ley was quick to criticise Albanese, stating that the prime minister was “out of touch” with the realities faced by everyday Australians.

“I’m not surprised Mr. Albanese is facing criticism for being out of touch with ordinary Australians who are really struggling,” she told Sky News.

She accused the government of failing to understand the pressures facing Australians, particularly in the lead-up to Christmas, when financial stress is often at its peak.

Senator Jane Hume, the Coalition’s finance spokeswoman, took an even stronger stance, calling the property purchase “tone deaf” amid a national housing crisis.

“I have a problem with the timing, and this is tone-deaf during a housing crisis,” Hume said in an interview with Seven’s Sunrise.

David Littleproud, leader of the Nationals, even went as far as to suggest that the purchase could signal Albanese’s intention to retire from politics.

“I hope that through popular demand, in six months, he gets to use it because he will be retired by the Australian people,” Littleproud told ABC News.

However, he did offer a compliment, acknowledging that Albanese had made “smart decisions” and shouldn’t be criticised solely for his personal financial choices.

Albanese’s Response

In response to the growing wave of criticism, Albanese acknowledged his good fortune in being able to afford such a property but rejected claims that it signified any disconnection from ordinary Australians.

Speaking to reporters, he highlighted his own working-class background, recalling his upbringing in public housing.

“My mum lived in the one public housing that she was born in for all of her 65 years, and I know what it’s like, which is why I want to help all Australians into a home,” Albanese said.

The prime minister was quick to refocus attention on his government’s policies aimed at addressing the housing crisis. He pointed to the Help to Buy scheme, rental assistance programs, and the Housing Australia Future Fund as key measures that are designed to tackle housing affordability.

“These are the policy challenges, and frankly, the other stuff, however much it might grab a headline, is not going to move the issue of housing affordability one iota,” he added.