North Korea’s state media said on Nov. 18 that South Korea’s U.S.-approved plan to build nuclear-powered submarines would trigger a hot arms race.
Pyongyang’s mouthpiece said Washington’s approval of the nuclear submarines collaboration was “a serious development that destabilizes the military security situation in the Asia-Pacific region beyond the Korean peninsula,” and accused Seoul of secretly advancing a “long-cherished ambition to possess nuclear weapons.”
That ambition, the KCNA commentary said, was bound to cause a “nuclear domino phenomenon” in the region and spark a “hot arms race.”
“The U.S. and the ROK are openly ignoring the DPRK’s legitimate security concern and aggravating the regional tension,” the opinion piece stated, adding that Pyongyang would “take more justified and realistic countermeasures to defend the sovereignty and security interests of the state and regional peace.”
South Korean presidential office spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said on Nov.18 that Seoul’s aim was still to ease tensions and restore trust between the two countries.
Kang added that security cooperation with Washington was designed to safeguard national interests and defense.

“The government will continue efforts to ensure the South Korea–U.S. alliance contributes to peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in the region,” she said.
Lee said the submarines would help South Korea “track Chinese and North Korean submarines” and help the United States in the region.
A day after the summit, Trump said in a post on Truth Social that he had approved Seoul’s request to construct nuclear-powered submarines at Philadelphia shipyards.
The fact sheet stated, “Consistent with the bilateral 123 agreement and subject to U.S. legal requirements, the United States supports the process that will lead to the ROK’s civil uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing for peaceful uses.”
Nuclear-powered submarines use enriched uranium as fuel, allowing them to operate for up to 30 years without refueling.
“South Korea does not need nuclear-powered submarines against North Korea’s naval or submarine force. The benefit of nuclear-powered submarines is for long-range missions far from the Korean Peninsula. As such, they are of great utility for regional contingencies, including monitoring Chinese submarines,” Klingner said.
“Trump’s decision was surprising since it reversed years of U.S. reluctance to agree to South Korea nuclear-powered submarines and renegotiating the civilian nuclear agreement. His decision may simply have been that having seemingly established a positive rapport with Lee during two summit meetings, Trump acquiesced to Lee’s nuclear request.”







