Challengers Tell Court Trudeau’s Prorogation Is Unjustified, Citing UK Supreme Court Decision

Challengers Tell Court Trudeau’s Prorogation Is Unjustified, Citing UK Supreme Court Decision
The Peace Tower on Parliament Hill in Ottawa is framed in a railing, on Jan. 24, 2025. The Canadian Press/Adrian Wyld
Matthew Horwood
Updated:
0:00

OTTAWA—Two citizens calling for the courts to find the government’s prorogation of Parliament to be an unlawful decision are using a UK Supreme Court decision in their argument before a federal judge. In 2019, the UK’s Supreme Court found that country’s government had illegally prorogued Parliament.

David MacKinnon and Aris Lavranos, two Nova Scotia men, presented their case before a federal court on Feb. 13 against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Jan. 6 decision to ask the governor general to prorogue Parliament. Trudeau, who said said he would be resigning as prime minister after the Liberal Party had chosen a new leader, said he asking Parliament to be suspended due to a deadlock in proceedings with the opposition.