EXPLAINER: Why Feds’ Net-Zero Plan Has Ignited Jurisdictional Disputes With Alberta, Saskatchewan

EXPLAINER: Why Feds’ Net-Zero Plan Has Ignited Jurisdictional Disputes With Alberta, Saskatchewan
(L–R) Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change Steven Guilbeault, and Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe. The Canadian Press/Jeff McIntosh; Spencer Colby; Michael Bell
Isaac Teo
Updated:
0:00

Jurisdictional disputes have flared up between the federal government and the Alberta and Saskatchewan provincial governments amid Ottawa’s push to bring in net-zero emissions electricity regulations by 2035.

The feds say the regulations are needed for Canada to meet its Paris Agreement target to reduce emissions by 40–45 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 and to reach net zero by 2050. The premiers of Alberta and Saskatchewan, however, are concerned about phasing out natural gas from their grids, citing energy security concerns, while accusing Ottawa of jurisdictional infringement.

Feds’ Proposal

Announced on Aug. 10, the proposed Clean Electricity Regulations (CER) aim to achieve net-zero emissions by “electrifying” more parts of the economy that rely on fossil fuels, such as transportation, home and water heating, and industrial activities. The provinces and territories have 75 days to comment on the draft proposal.