Why the Founders Couldn’t Abolish Slavery

Defending the Constitution
Part 8
Save
Why the Founders Couldn’t Abolish Slavery
Slaves plant sweet potatoes on the Cassina Point Plantation in South Carolina in 1862. Library of Congress
Slaves plant sweet potatoes on the Cassina Point Plantation in South Carolina in 1862. Library of Congress
Updated:
This essay addresses one of the most persistent criticisms of the Constitution: that it was adopted to protect, or least accommodate, slavery. As explained below, that criticism is historically false.

The Critics’ Deceptive Statistic

The critics point out that perhaps 25 of the Constitution’s 55 framers (drafters) were slaveholders.

But this statistic is deceptive. One reason it’s deceptive is that it omits a countervailing factor: The Constitutional Convention also included influential opponents of slavery. John Dickinson inherited bondsmen but freed them all. Benjamin Franklin, James Wilson, and Gouverneur Morris, among others, were abolitionists. And even among the minority who held slaves, some, such as James Madison, favored gradual emancipation.

AD