Supreme Court to Consider Whether Bump Stocks Violate Federal Law

The dispute centers around what constitutes an automatic weapon.
Supreme Court to Consider Whether Bump Stocks Violate Federal Law
A bump fire stock that attaches to a semiautomatic rifle to increase the firing rate is seen at Good Guys Gun Shop in Orem, Utah, on Oct. 4, 2017. George Frey/Reuters
Sam Dorman
Sam Dorman
Washington Correspondent
|Updated:
0:00

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on Feb. 28 in the case of Garland v. Cargill, which concerns whether a bump stock transforms a semiautomatic firearm into the type of “machine gun” prohibited under federal law.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) said for years that nonmechanical bump stocks, or those without internal springs, didn’t constitute a machine gun since they didn’t produce automatic fire.

Sam Dorman
Sam Dorman
Washington Correspondent
Sam Dorman is a Washington correspondent covering courts and politics for The Epoch Times. You can follow him on X at @EpochofDorman.
twitter
Related Topics