Supreme Court Finds for Bank Whistleblower

Retaliatory intent by employer need not be proven, high court rules in whistleblower case.
Supreme Court Finds for Bank Whistleblower
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Jan. 2, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
Matthew Vadum
Updated:

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled against an investment bank on Feb. 8, reinstating a $900,000 jury award in favor of whistleblowers claiming retaliation.

In a highly technical ruling in Murray v. UBS Securities LLC, the justices found that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a financial services reform law aimed at protecting investors, does not require whistleblowers to demonstrate that they were the victims of intentional retaliation.

Related Topics