This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact The Epoch Times Reprints.

The Epoch Times
The Epoch Times
AD
The Epoch Times
US Supreme Court

Supreme Court Asked to Exempt California Schoolchild From Vaccination Mandate

On Sept. 9, a federal appeals court declined to halt the state policy.
Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Supreme Court Asked to Exempt California Schoolchild From Vaccination Mandate
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Sept. 11, 2025. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch Times
Matthew Vadum
Matthew Vadum
9/23/2025|Updated: 9/30/2025
0:00

An advocacy group is urging the Supreme Court to allow a religious parent to opt her child out of California’s mandatory vaccination policy for schoolchildren.

The new application in We The Patriots USA v. Ventura Unified School District, docketed by the nation’s highest court on Sept. 19, was directed to Justice Elena Kagan, who oversees emergency appeals from California.

We The Patriots is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Caldwell, Idaho.

California’s position is that its vaccination mandate keeps children healthy and prevents the spread of dangerous illnesses.

The group filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court on behalf of a woman identified as Jane Doe, who is seeking an exemption for her son from the vaccination mandate based on his personal beliefs.

The school district initially granted the son an exemption based on his personal beliefs but later revoked it. The school district has barred the son from attending school for the time being. His last full day of school attendance was in December 2024.

Related Stories
The Epoch Times
Court Upholds New York’s Repeal of Religious Exemptions to School Vaccination Requirements
The Epoch Times
California Won’t Mandate COVID-19 Vaccines for School Attendance

Doe applied for the exemption based on her understanding that the vaccines required by state law are “researched, developed, tested, and/or produced using cell lines artificially developed from aborted fetuses and contain products that could result in harm to a human recipient,” according to the application.

The Constitution’s First Amendment does not allow “California to exile children from public school because their parents seek to raise them in accordance with their religious beliefs,” the application states, citing the Supreme Court’s June ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor.

In that case, the high court ruled for parents in Maryland who, for religious reasons, wanted to opt their young children out of school storybooks that promote LGBT lifestyles.

“That principle protects parents’ right to opt their children out of LGBTQ+ school curricula. It also protects parents’ right to opt their children out of an act that would render them complicit in abortion,” the application reads.

On Sept. 9, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied the group’s request to pause an Aug. 15 order by U.S. District Judge André Birotte. The district judge rejected the group’s request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to suspend the vaccination policy.

We The Patriots had filed with the district court on May 22, asking it to block the enforcement of section 120335 of the California Health and Safety Code against the plaintiffs and other parents and children whose sincere religious beliefs prevent them from receiving the required immunizations.

That state law states that school districts in California may “not unconditionally admit any person as a pupil” unless he or she has been immunized against diphtheria, influenza, measles, mumps, whooping cough, polio, rubella, tetanus, hepatitis B, chickenpox, and “any other disease deemed appropriate” by the state public health department.

The district court previously rejected a prior application for a temporary restraining order on June 17, finding that the plaintiffs failed to show that they would face irreparable harm without such an order, according to Birotte.

On Sept. 22, Kagan directed the school district to file a response by 4 p.m. on Oct. 1.

The fact that the Supreme Court asked the other side to respond to the application is “a small threshold victory,” We The People’s attorney, Cameron Atkinson of Harwinton, Connecticut, said in a post on X.

“It shows that our application was not so frivolous as to merit immediate denial,” he said.

The Epoch Times has reached out for comment to the Ventura Unified School District in California. No reply was received by publication time.

Google LogoMark Us Preferred on Google
Matthew Vadum
Matthew Vadum
Author
Matthew Vadum is an award-winning investigative journalist.
Author’s Selected Articles
Key Takeaways From Supreme Court Ruling on Late-Arriving Ballots
Jun 30, 2026
Key Takeaways From Supreme Court Ruling on Late-Arriving Ballots
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Dispute Over Arizona’s Proof-of-Citizenship Voting Law
Jun 29, 2026
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Dispute Over Arizona’s Proof-of-Citizenship Voting Law
Supreme Court Upholds State Law Allowing Ballots That Arrive After Election Day
Jun 29, 2026
Supreme Court Upholds State Law Allowing Ballots That Arrive After Election Day
Supreme Court’s Alito Offers Unusual Response to Sotomayor’s Dissent in Immigration Case
Jun 27, 2026
Supreme Court’s Alito Offers Unusual Response to Sotomayor’s Dissent in Immigration Case
AD
Add to My List
Save
The Epoch Times
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 The Epoch Times Association Inc. All Rights Reserved.