Judge Disqualifies DOJ Attorney Investigating New York AG Letitia James

New York Attorney General Letitia James had argued John Sarcone was illegally appointed to the post.

New York Attorney General Letitia James stands silently during a press conference in New York City, on Oct. 21, 2025. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

A federal judge disqualified an acting U.S. attorney on Jan. 8 and invalidated subpoenas he issued for New York Attorney General Letitia James.

John A. Sarcone III, who was serving in the Northern District of New York, is the fifth Trump-appointed interim U.S. attorney disqualified by federal courts during President Donald Trump’s second term. James had challenged Sarcone’s authority after he issued subpoenas seeking information about lawsuits she pursued that accused Trump of fraud. Sarcone had also issued subpoenas regarding James’s investigation of the National Rifle Association and its prior leadership.

Trump had nominated Sarcone as U.S. attorney, but his appointment was blocked in the U.S. Senate. Sarcone had been part of Trump’s legal team during the 2016 presidential campaign and worked as regional administrator for the Northeast and Caribbean in the U.S. General Services Administration during Trump’s first term.

The U.S. Department of Justice argued Sarcone was properly appointed and the subpoenas were legal. James alleged that the investigation was political retribution by the Trump administration.

U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield noted in her ruling that Sarcone was initially appointed, effective March 17, 2025, to serve as interim U.S. attorney for 120 days. When that term ran out, the judges in his judicial district failed to extend his term as they had the discretion to do under federal law.

“Federal law then required the use of other statutory procedures to fill the position,” Schofield said. “The Department of Justice did not follow those procedures.”

Instead, the judge said, the Justice Department “took coordinated steps—through personnel moves and shifting titles—to install Mr. Sarcone as Acting U.S. Attorney. Federal law does not permit such a workaround.”

“When the Executive branch of government skirts restraints put in place by Congress and then uses that power to subject political adversaries to criminal investigations, it acts without lawful authority,” Schofield said.

The judge disqualified Sarcone from further participating in the underlying investigations and found the subpoenas at issue were invalid. Because Sarcone is not lawfully serving as acting U.S. attorney, “any of his past or future acts taken in that capacity are void or voidable as they would rest on authority Mr. Sarcone does not lawfully have,” she said.

James’s office hailed the new ruling disqualifying Sarcone, calling it “an important win for the rule of law.”

“We will continue to defend our office’s successful litigation from this administration’s political attacks,” the statement said.

After the ruling, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice told The Epoch Times the agency “will continue to fight and defend the President and the Attorney General’s authority to appoint their own U.S. Attorneys.”

The ruling came after a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit disqualified Trump administration appointee Alina Habba as U.S. attorney for New Jersey on Dec. 1, 2025.

The administration’s decision to appoint Habba as first assistant U.S. attorney does not make her acting U.S. attorney, “because only the first assistant in place at the time of the vacancy arises automatically assumes the functions and duties of the office under the [Federal Vacancies Reform Act].”

Lawsuits had been filed by three New Jersey defendants facing prosecution under Habba. They alleged that she held the position unlawfully, and sought to have their cases dismissed.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.