Graham and McConnell Say Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings to Proceed as Scheduled

Graham and McConnell Say Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings to Proceed as Scheduled
Judge Amy Coney Barrett listens during her nomination to the Supreme Court, in Washington on Sept. 26, 2020. (Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)
Tom Ozimek

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) announced Saturday that the Senate Judiciary Committee is proceeding with the same Supreme Court confirmation hearing schedule starting on Oct. 12, while Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said he would adjust the floor schedule to accommodate the hearings.

Graham, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement that there would be no change to the confirmation hearing schedule and that the panel will proceed with the consideration of the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the nation’s highest court.

McConnell, in an Oct. 3 statement regarding the upcoming Senate floor schedule, said that he plans to obtain a consent agreement for the Senate to meet in pro forma sessions for the next two weeks and that previously scheduled Senate floor activity would be rescheduled until after Oct. 19 to allow the Judiciary Committee to hold its hearings without conflict.

“The Senate’s floor schedule will not interrupt the thorough, fair, and historically supported confirmation process previously laid out by Chairman Graham,” McConnell wrote.

Questions have been raised about whether the COVID-19 diagnosis of two Republican members of the committee—Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.)—would impact the confirmation hearing schedule. Both senators have said they plan to undergo a 10-day quarantine, set to conclude by the time Barrett’s confirmation hearings are scheduled to begin. Republicans hold a 12-10 majority on the Judiciary Committee and, with Democrats expected to vote against, participation of all GOP senators is key for Barrett’s candidature to clear the committee for a floor vote.

In separate remarks, the South Carolina senator told reporters on Friday that he had spoken to President Donald Trump and told him that the hearings were “on track.” Graham earlier said that the Judiciary Committee would vote on Barrett’s nomination on Oct. 22, possibly setting up a floor vote by the end of the month.

McConnell, who has vowed to put Barrett’s candidacy to a vote this year, said on Friday that her nomination is “full steam ahead.”

“Just finished a great phone call with @POTUS. He’s in good spirits and we talked business—especially how impressed Senators are with the qualifications of Judge Barrett. Full steam ahead with the fair, thorough, timely process that the nominee, the Court, & the country deserve,” McConnell wrote on Twitter.

McConnell told radio Hugh Hewitt on Friday that safety considerations amid the COVID-19 mean the Judiciary Committee hearings may be held remotely.

“Should the hearing be conducted remotely? Should the room be kept relatively uncrowded if in fact the Senate Judiciary Committee convenes at the instruction of Senator Graham?” host Hugh Hewitt asked.

“Members, some of them have, I think, done their interviews in previous hearings remotely. This sort of underscores, I think, the need to do that. And I think every precaution needs to be taken, because we don’t anticipate any Democratic support at all, either in committee or in the full Senate, and therefore, everybody needs to be in an all hands on deck mindset,” McConnell replied.

In his Senate floor schedule statement, McConnell said that the Judiciary Committee has, since May, “operated flawlessly through a hybrid method that has seen some Senators appear physically at its hearings while other members have participated virtually,” adding that all Republican senators intend to take part in the hearings.

Trump nominated Barrett to fill a vacant seat on the high bench after the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. If Barrett is successfully appointed, this would give the Supreme Court a 6–3 conservative majority.

Republicans have largely hailed the decision to move forward with the nomination, while Democrats have been vocal in their opposition.

Tom Ozimek is a senior reporter for The Epoch Times. He has a broad background in journalism, deposit insurance, marketing and communications, and adult education.
Related Topics