Feds Sue Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois Over Prediction Markets Jurisdiction Dispute

The dispute centers on whether prediction markets fall under federal law or state gambling statutes as scrutiny grows.
Feds Sue Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois Over Prediction Markets Jurisdiction Dispute
Signage outside the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in Washington on Aug. 30, 2020. Andrew Kelly/Reuters
|Updated:
0:00
The federal government on Thursday sued Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois to stop their regulation of prediction markets, arguing that it holds jurisdiction over event contracts traded on federally registered platforms.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said the three states have attempted to ban, regulate, or restrain the activities of designated contract markets that offer trading in lawful event contracts—a legally binding “yes or no” bet on the outcome of real-world events. The agency says that such attempts by the states undermine its authority under the Commodity Exchange Act.
Kimberly Hayek
Kimberly Hayek
Author
Kimberly Hayek is a reporter for The Epoch Times. She covers California news and has worked as an editor and on scene at the U.S.-Mexico border during the 2018 migrant caravan crisis.